Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Influence of organic manures on growth and yield of vegetable Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.)

Ammaladinne Tharun Kumar; E. Somasundaram; N. Thavaprakaash

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during Kharif season of 2018-19. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with twelve treatments replicated thrice Viz., Organic farmer’s practice, FYM @ 25 t/ha + Panchagavya @ 3% as foliar spray (FS), FYM @ 12.5 t/ha + Panchagavya @ 3% as FS, FYM @ 12.5 t/ha + banana pseudostem sap @ 2% as FS, Vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Panchagavya @ 3% as FS, Vermicompost @ 5t/ha + banana pseudostem sap @ 2% as FS, Ganajeevamruth @ 500 kg/ha + Panchagavya @ 3% as FS, Ganajeevamruth @ 500 kg/ha + banana pseudostem sap @ 2% as FS, Humic acid @ 6 l/ha + Panchagavya @ 3% as FS, Humic acid @ 6 l/ha + banana pseudostem sap @ 2% as FS, recommended dose of NPK fertilizers (RDF)(50:50:25) + TNAU pulse wonder @ 1% as FS and absolute control. The study revealed that germination and plant population were not statistically different. Significantly higher plant height (32.43 cm, 30.91 cm and 28.52 cm), more number of leaves (15.17, 18.85, 10.57, and 8.50) at 30, 45, 60 DAS and harvest stages, respectively, higher number of pods per plant (93.07) and vegetable clusterbean yield (11084 kg/ha) at harvest stage were recorded under RDF in addition to foliar spray of TNAU pulse wonder. It was statistically on par with treatments such as organic farmer’s practice and 25 t/ha of FYM along with foliar spray of 3 per cent Panchagavya.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination did not differ significantly across treatments.

Treatment
organic manurest0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
not statistically differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination and plant population were not statistically different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“organic manures on growth and yield of vegetable Clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population did not differ significantly across treatments.

Treatment
organic manurest0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Direction
not statistically differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination and plant population were not statistically different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“organic manures on growth and yield of vegetable Clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with TNAU pulse wonder produced significantly higher plant height.

Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.43 cm, 30.91 cm and 28.52 cme0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher plant height (32.43 cm, 30.91 cm and 28.52 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with TNAU pulse wonder produced more leaves.

Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
moree0
Value
15.17, 18.85, 10.57, and 8.50e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more number of leaves (15.17, 18.85, 10.57, and 8.50) at 30, 45, 60 DAS and harvest stages, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with TNAU pulse wonder produced more pods per plant.

Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
93.07e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher number of pods per plant (93.07)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with TNAU pulse wonder produced higher clusterbean yield of 11084 kg/ha.

Treatment
RDF in addition to foliar spray of TNAU pulse wondere0
Outcome
vegetable clusterbean yielde0
Value
11084 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vegetable clusterbean yield (11084 kg/ha) at harvest stage were recorded under RDF in addition to foliar spray of TNAU pulse wonder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The RDF and TNAU pulse wonder treatment was statistically comparable to organic farmer’s practice.

Treatment
organic farmer’s practicee0
Outcome
statistically on pare0
Direction
statistically on pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was statistically on par with treatments such as organic farmer’s practice and 25 t/ha of FYM along with foliar spray of 3 per cent Panchagavya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The RDF and TNAU pulse wonder treatment was statistically comparable to FYM plus Panchagavya.

Treatment
25 t/ha of FYM along with foliar spray of 3 per cent Panchagavyae0
Outcome
statistically on pare0
Direction
statistically on pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was statistically on par with treatments such as organic farmer’s practice and 25 t/ha of FYM along with foliar spray of 3 per cent Panchagavya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Clusterbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–73 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

92 papers: 90 positive, 2 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

application · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.