Paper · 2019 · International Letters of Natural Sciences

Using of Microbial Fertilizer as Biostimulant Alleviates Damage from Drought Stress in Guar (Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.) Seedlings

Alpaslan Kusvuran; Sebnem Kusvuran

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought is a significant environmental stress that limits plant growth and yield. In this study, an investigation of guar, grown under different drought level conditions [(S0: 100% of field capacity), S1 (depletion of 75% the available water holding capacity), S2 (depletion of 50% the available water holding capacity), S3 (depletion of 25% the available water holding capacity), S4 (no applied irrigation water)] with regards to the impact of Chlorella vulgaris based microbial fertilizer on physiological, morphological, and enzymatic activity was performed. Microbial fertilizer applications significantly increased shoot length, fresh and dry weight of the shoot and root, and leaf number and area of guar plants compared to the only drought stress treatments. In addition, following the above-mentioned procedures, there were significant increases in the relative water content, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutation reductase (GR) activity. However, the malondialdehyde (MDA) content were significantly decreased. Hence, the results support the administration of a foliar application to the microbial fertilizer containing microalgae in order to increase the guar plant’s defense system, enabling it to tolerate the negative effects resulting from drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer significantly increased guar shoot length, shoot fresh and dry weights, and root fresh and dry weights relative to drought alone.

Treatment
Microbial fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
shoot length, fresh and dry weight of the shoot and roote0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
only drought stress treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial fertilizer applications significantly increased shoot length, fresh and dry weight of the shoot and root, and leaf number and area of guar plants compared to the only drought stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer significantly increased guar leaf number and area relative to drought alone.

Treatment
Microbial fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
leaf number and areae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
only drought stress treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial fertilizer applications significantly increased shoot length, fresh and dry weight of the shoot and root, and leaf number and area of guar plants compared to the only drought stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer significantly increased relative water content and total phenolic and flavonoid contents.

Treatment
Microbial Fertilizert1
Outcome
relative water content, total phenolic and flavonoid contentse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant increases in the relative water content, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutation reductase (GR) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar (Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–128 · show in text ↑
t1

“Microbial Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer significantly increased SOD, CAT, and APX activity.

Treatment
Microbial Fertilizert1
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant increases in the relative water content, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutation reductase (GR) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar (Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–128 · show in text ↑
t1

“Microbial Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer significantly increased GR activity.

Treatment
Microbial Fertilizert1
Outcome
glutation reductase (GR) activitye0
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glutation reductase (GR) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1033 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were significant increases in the relative water content, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutation reductase (GR) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar (Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–128 · show in text ↑
t1

“Microbial Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer significantly decreased malondialdehyde content.

Treatment
Microbial Fertilizert1
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the malondialdehyde (MDA) content were significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guar (Cyamopsis Tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–128 · show in text ↑
t1

“Microbial Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–29 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: oxidative · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.