Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Studies on use of Potassium and Zinc on Nutrient Uptake by Chickpea

SM Fulmali; RA Jadhav; Deshmukh

18
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was planned and conducted during Rabi 2015-16 to evaluate the “Studies on use of potassium and zinc on yield and nutrient uptake by chickpea”. The experiment was conducted the Departmental Research Farm of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. There were eight treatments comprising of K and zinc levels viz ; T1- Absolute control, T2- Only RDF through soil (25:50:00 NPK kg ha-1), T3 –RDF + 15 kg K2O ha-1, T4- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1, T5- RDF+45 kg K2O ha-1, T6- RDF+15 kg K2O ha-1+25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1, T7- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1, T8- RDF + 45 kg K2O ha-1 + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. The results indicated that, the application of RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 improved growth, straw yield. Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation. The total uptake of nutrients were significantly increased with application of potassium and zinc @; RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 and RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. The uptake of N, P, K and zinc was increased due to K application and maximum uptake of these nutrients were noticed in the treatments receiving K and Zn in combinations. Available N and P status at various growth stages of chickpea were found to be increased at pod development stage and thereafter, N and P available status was decreased. Potassium availability was decreased from flowering to harvesting stage, and sulfur availability increased till the harvesting. In respect of micronutrients, no specific trend was noted. However, the application of zinc to chickpea maintained the higher Zn availability throughout the crop growth period. The plant nutrient concentration studied in the present investigation was enhanced due to K and Zn application over absolute control. Thus, the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio. These findings indicate requirement of K and Zn to chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined K and Zn fertilizer improved chickpea growth and straw yield.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
growth, straw yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 improved growth, straw yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and zinc supplementation raised Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S) in the chickpea experiment.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
potassium and zinc supplementatione0
Outcome
Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and zinc supplementation raised micronutrients in the chickpea experiment.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
potassium and zinc supplementatione0
Outcome
micronutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and zinc supplementation raised plant nutrient concentration in the chickpea experiment.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
potassium and zinc supplementatione0
Outcome
plant nutrient concentratione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea nutrient uptake significantly increased under RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1e0
Outcome
total uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total uptake of nutrients were significantly increased with application of potassium and zinc @; RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 and RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea nutrient uptake significantly increased under RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
total uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total uptake of nutrients were significantly increased with application of potassium and zinc @; RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 and RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K application increased chickpea N, P, K and zinc uptake.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
K applicatione0
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K and zince0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of N, P, K and zinc was increased due to K application and maximum uptake of these nutrients were noticed in the treatments receiving K and Zn in combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined K and Zn gave maximum nutrient uptake in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
K and Zn in combinationse0
Outcome
uptake of these nutrientse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of N, P, K and zinc was increased due to K application and maximum uptake of these nutrients were noticed in the treatments receiving K and Zn in combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available N and P increased at chickpea pod development.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
pod development stagee0
Outcome
Available N and P statuse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Available N and P status at various growth stages of chickpea were found to be increased at pod development stage and thereafter, N and P available status was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available N and P decreased after chickpea pod development.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
N and P available statuse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Available N and P status at various growth stages of chickpea were found to be increased at pod development stage and thereafter, N and P available status was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium availability decreased over chickpea development.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Potassium availabilitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium availability was decreased from flowering to harvesting stage, and sulfur availability increased till the harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sulfur availability increased over chickpea development.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
sulfur availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium availability was decreased from flowering to harvesting stage, and sulfur availability increased till the harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients showed no specific trend.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
micronutrientse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In respect of micronutrients, no specific trend was noted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application maintained higher Zn availability during chickpea growth.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
application of zince0
Outcome
Zn availabilitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of zinc to chickpea maintained the higher Zn availability throughout the crop growth period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K and Zn application enhanced chickpea plant nutrient concentration over absolute control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
K and Zn applicatione0
Outcome
plant nutrient concentratione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
absolute controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant nutrient concentration studied in the present investigation was enhanced due to K and Zn application over absolute control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined K and Zn treatment produced maximum gross monetary returns.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
gross monetary returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
1.74 B:C ratioe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined K and Zn treatment produced maximum net monetary returns.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
net monetary returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
1.74 B:C ratioe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined K and Zn treatment produced maximum monetary benefits.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
monetary benefitse0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
1.74 B:C ratioe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–67 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.