Abstract
A field experiment was planned and conducted during Rabi 2015-16 to evaluate the “Studies on use of potassium and zinc on yield and nutrient uptake by chickpea”. The experiment was conducted the Departmental Research Farm of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. There were eight treatments comprising of K and zinc levels viz ; T1- Absolute control, T2- Only RDF through soil (25:50:00 NPK kg ha-1), T3 –RDF + 15 kg K2O ha-1, T4- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1, T5- RDF+45 kg K2O ha-1, T6- RDF+15 kg K2O ha-1+25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1, T7- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1, T8- RDF + 45 kg K2O ha-1 + 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. The results indicated that, the application of RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 improved growth, straw yield. Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation. The total uptake of nutrients were significantly increased with application of potassium and zinc @; RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 and RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. The uptake of N, P, K and zinc was increased due to K application and maximum uptake of these nutrients were noticed in the treatments receiving K and Zn in combinations. Available N and P status at various growth stages of chickpea were found to be increased at pod development stage and thereafter, N and P available status was decreased. Potassium availability was decreased from flowering to harvesting stage, and sulfur availability increased till the harvesting. In respect of micronutrients, no specific trend was noted. However, the application of zinc to chickpea maintained the higher Zn availability throughout the crop growth period. The plant nutrient concentration studied in the present investigation was enhanced due to K and Zn application over absolute control. Thus, the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio. These findings indicate requirement of K and Zn to chickpea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Combined K and Zn fertilizer improved chickpea growth and straw yield.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
- Outcome
- growth, straw yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the application of RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 improved growth, straw yield.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium and zinc supplementation raised Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S) in the chickpea experiment.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- potassium and zinc supplementatione0
- Outcome
- Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium and zinc supplementation raised micronutrients in the chickpea experiment.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- potassium and zinc supplementatione0
- Outcome
- micronutrientse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium and zinc supplementation raised plant nutrient concentration in the chickpea experiment.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- potassium and zinc supplementatione0
- Outcome
- plant nutrient concentratione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soil fertility status (available N, P, K, and S), micronutrients and plant nutrient concentration were higher in the treatments receiving potassium and zinc supplementation.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea nutrient uptake significantly increased under RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1e0
- Outcome
- total uptake of nutrientse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The total uptake of nutrients were significantly increased with application of potassium and zinc @; RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 and RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea nutrient uptake significantly increased under RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
- Outcome
- total uptake of nutrientse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The total uptake of nutrients were significantly increased with application of potassium and zinc @; RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 and RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
K application increased chickpea N, P, K and zinc uptake.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- K applicatione0
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P, K and zince0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The uptake of N, P, K and zinc was increased due to K application and maximum uptake of these nutrients were noticed in the treatments receiving K and Zn in combinations.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined K and Zn gave maximum nutrient uptake in chickpea.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- K and Zn in combinationse0
- Outcome
- uptake of these nutrientse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The uptake of N, P, K and zinc was increased due to K application and maximum uptake of these nutrients were noticed in the treatments receiving K and Zn in combinations.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Available N and P increased at chickpea pod development.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Organ / stage
- pod development stagee0
- Outcome
- Available N and P statuse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Available N and P status at various growth stages of chickpea were found to be increased at pod development stage and thereafter, N and P available status was decreased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Available N and P decreased after chickpea pod development.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Outcome
- N and P available statuse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Available N and P status at various growth stages of chickpea were found to be increased at pod development stage and thereafter, N and P available status was decreased.”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium availability decreased over chickpea development.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Outcome
- Potassium availabilitye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Potassium availability was decreased from flowering to harvesting stage, and sulfur availability increased till the harvesting.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
sulfur availability increased over chickpea development.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Outcome
- sulfur availabilitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Potassium availability was decreased from flowering to harvesting stage, and sulfur availability increased till the harvesting.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Micronutrients showed no specific trend.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Outcome
- micronutrientse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In respect of micronutrients, no specific trend was noted.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application maintained higher Zn availability during chickpea growth.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- application of zince0
- Outcome
- Zn availabilitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the application of zinc to chickpea maintained the higher Zn availability throughout the crop growth period.”
Claim · model-written summary
K and Zn application enhanced chickpea plant nutrient concentration over absolute control.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- K and Zn applicatione0
- Outcome
- plant nutrient concentratione0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- absolute controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The plant nutrient concentration studied in the present investigation was enhanced due to K and Zn application over absolute control.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined K and Zn treatment produced maximum gross monetary returns.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
- Outcome
- gross monetary returnse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- 1.74 B:C ratioe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined K and Zn treatment produced maximum net monetary returns.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
- Outcome
- net monetary returnse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- 1.74 B:C ratioe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined K and Zn treatment produced maximum monetary benefits.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
- Outcome
- monetary benefitse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- 1.74 B:C ratioe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maximum gross monetary returns, net monetary returns and monetary benefits were observed in treatment receiving RDF + 30 kg K2O ha-1 +25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 with 1.74 B:C ratio.”
t0“Chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
32 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →potassium · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
potassium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.