Paper · 2021 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Agronomic Biofortification of Zinc in Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil

P.M. Parmar; T.C. Poonia; V.N. Raiyani

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Pulses are wonderful gift of the nature to agriculture. They provide nutrition to human beings and animals as food and feed respectively. Among the pulses, chickpea is an important rabi season crop with high acceptability and wider use in nutritional food basket. A field experiment was carried out on medium black calcareous soil at Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh, Gujarat during rabi season 2017-18 under saurastra condition to evaluate agronomic biofortification of zinc in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties through seed, soil and foliar application. Methods: The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with three replications. The treatment combinations comprised two varieties viz., GG 1 (V1) and GJG 3 (V2) and six zinc fortification treatments viz., control, seed treatment ZnSO4 @ 3 g kg-1 seed, 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray, seed treatment ZnSO4 @ 3g kg-1 seed + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray, soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 and soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray. The chickpea was grown with standard package of practices. Result: The results revealed that a significant improvement in 100-seed weight, seed yield, stover yield and biological yield were observed with chickpea variety GJG 3 over GG 1. Significantly higher numbers of pods per plant (45.83) was recorded with variety GG 1. Significantly, chickpea variety GJG 3 was found superior in zinc content and uptake in seed and stover. Under agronomic strategy, zinc fortification through soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GJG 3 had significantly improved 100-seed weight over GG 1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
GJG 3e0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
GG 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant improvement in 100-seed weight, seed yield, stover yield and biological yield were observed with chickpea variety GJG 3 over GG 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GJG 3 had significantly improved seed yield over GG 1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
GJG 3e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
GG 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant improvement in 100-seed weight, seed yield, stover yield and biological yield were observed with chickpea variety GJG 3 over GG 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GJG 3 had significantly improved stover yield over GG 1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
GJG 3e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
GG 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant improvement in 100-seed weight, seed yield, stover yield and biological yield were observed with chickpea variety GJG 3 over GG 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GJG 3 had significantly improved biological yield over GG 1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
GJG 3e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
GG 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant improvement in 100-seed weight, seed yield, stover yield and biological yield were observed with chickpea variety GJG 3 over GG 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GG 1 had significantly more pods per plant, 45.83.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
GG 1e0
Outcome
pods per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
45.83e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher numbers of pods per plant (45.83) was recorded with variety GG 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GJG 3 had superior zinc content and uptake in seed and stover.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
GJG 3e0
Outcome
zinc content and uptake in seed and stovere0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea variety GJG 3 was found superior in zinc content and uptake in seed and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved pods per plant to 55.17.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
pods per plante0
Direction
improvede0
Value
55.17e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved seed yield to 2288 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
2288 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved stover yield to 3553 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
3553 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved protein content in seed to 22.89%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
protein content in seede0
Direction
improvede0
Value
22.89%e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved protein yield to 523 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
523 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved zinc content in seed to 45.98 ppm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
zinc content and uptake in seed and stovere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
45.98e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved zinc content in stover to 37.51 ppm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
zinc content and uptake in seed and stovere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
37.51 ppme0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved zinc uptake in seed to 104.87 g ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
zinc content and uptake in seed and stovere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
104.87e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar zinc treatment improved zinc uptake in stover to 133.35 g ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spraye0
Outcome
zinc content and uptake in seed and stovere0
Direction
improvede0
Value
133.35 g ha-1e0
Qualifier
at flowering and pod filling stagese0
Comparator
all other zinc biofortification treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 + 0.5% ZnSO4 foliar spray at flowering and pod filling stages significantly improved yield attribute and yield viz., pods per plant (55.17), seed yield (2288 kg ha-1) and stover yield (3553 kg ha-1) and quality parameters viz., protein content in seed (22.89%) and protein yield (523 kg ha-1), zinc content and uptake in seed and stover (45.98 and 37.51 ppm and 104.87 and 133.35 g ha-1, respectively) over all other zinc biofortification treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea Varieties in Calcareous Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–75 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.