Abstract
An experiment was conducted to assess the responses of different combinations of FYM, vermicompost, PSB, Azotobacter, nitrogenous sources (calcium nitrate and urea) along with Jeevamrut during 2015-2017 on full grown (20 years) apricot trees of New Castle cultivar, planted at a distance of 5 × 5 m. The experiment had fourteen treatments with three replicates. It has been found that different treatments had a sighificant effect on fruit quality parameters. Maximum fruit length, fruit firmness and fruit breadth, fruit suture, fruit weight and fruit volume was recorded with the application of 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost and 0% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost, respectively. While, maximum TSS, TSS/acid ratio, total sugars (11.45%), reducing sugars and minimum titratable acidity was recorded under 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + FYM]. Also, maximum yield was recorded with application of 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost during the present course of study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient treatments significantly affected apricot fruit quality parameters.
- Taxon
- apricot
Prunus armeniacat0 - Outcome
- fruit quality parameterse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“different treatments had a sighificant effect on fruit quality parameters”
t0“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The first reported nutrient combination maximized fruit length, firmness and breadth.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicomposte0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- fruit length, fruit firmness and fruit breadthe0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum fruit length, fruit firmness and fruit breadth, fruit suture, fruit weight and fruit volume was recorded with the application of 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost and 0% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost, respectively”
t0“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The second reported nutrient combination maximized fruit suture, weight and volume.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- 0% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicomposte0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- fruit suture, fruit weight and fruit volumee0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum fruit length, fruit firmness and fruit breadth, fruit suture, fruit weight and fruit volume was recorded with the application of 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost and 0% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost, respectively”
t0“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The FYM nutrient combination maximized TSS, TSS to acid ratio and total sugars.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + FYMe0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- TSS, TSS/acid ratio, total sugarse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum TSS, TSS/acid ratio, total sugars (11.45%), reducing sugars and minimum titratable acidity was recorded under 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + FYM”
t0“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Total sugars reached 11.45% under the FYM nutrient combination.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + FYMe0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- total sugarse0
- Value
- 11.45%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total sugars (11.45%), reducing sugars and minimum titratable acidity was recorded under 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + FYM”
t0“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The FYM nutrient combination minimized titratable acidity.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + FYMe0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- titratable aciditye0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum titratable acidity was recorded under 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + FYM”
t0“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The vermicompost nutrient combination maximized apricot yield.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicomposte0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum yield was recorded with application of 50% N (CN) + 50% N (Urea) + Azotobacter + PSB + Vermicompost”
t0“apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · quality: postharvest · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.