Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Review on climatic impact on area, productivity of Madhya Pradesh, strategies and mitigating technology on yield and benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

Sudhir Singh; Y.V. Singh; Ravi Singh Gurjar; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted on climatic abnormalities impact on changes in area and productivity after 3 decades of different agro-climatic regions of Madhya Pradesh state of India and mitigation technologies on yield and benefits of chickpea. Absolute and relative changes in area was increased by 627.67 thousand ha and 40.7% against base years (1980 to 83) area 1541.74 thousand ha, while increased in productivity by 178.33 kg ha-1 and 37.9% compared with base year yield (471.00 kg ha-1), respectively. All agro-climatic regions showed prominent disparity in area and productivity. Maximum area increased in Malwa plateau (420.03 thousand ha), whereas decreased in Satpura hills (-57.43 thousand ha) compared with base year. Trend of relative changes was obtained in area higher of Jhabua hills (241.18%), while declined in Satpura plateau (-24.55%). Relative changes in productivity was increased of Gird region (128.44%), whereas declined in Vindhyan plateau (-14.40%) compared of base year. Adoption of technologies was neutralized effect of climatic abnormalities. Excess soil moisture through winter rains or faulty irrigation which leads increases plant growth. Under these conditions, crop sown by BBF increased yield by 74.7%, whereas minimum increases in grain yield was using drought tolerant cultivar JG-14 (18.5%) under drought conditions. Adverse effect of terminal heat reduced by advance sowing with ZT just after harvest of Kharif crops, resulting increased of grain yield by 22.2%, while root rot effect was diminished by BBF sowing of JG-11 cultivar increased grain yield by 37.7% over control. Wilt infestation under rainfed situations was reduced by summer deep tillage and sowing resistant cultivar JG-11 resulted increased in yield by 37.5%, whereas increase of 38.1% grain yield by crop sown with BBF and spray of Mencozeb 3 g lit.-1 water at appearance of cerecospora disease. Similarly, using improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalities gave higher net returns and B:C ratio compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea area rose by 627.67 thousand ha and 40.7% from the base years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
627.67 thousand hae0
Qualifier
40.7%e0
Comparator
base years (1980 to 83)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Absolute and relative changes in area was increased by 627.67 thousand ha and 40.7% against base years (1980 to 83) area 1541.74 thousand ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea productivity rose by 178.33 kg ha-1 and 37.9% from the base year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
178.33 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
37.9%e0
Comparator
base year yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while increased in productivity by 178.33 kg ha-1 and 37.9% compared with base year yield (471.00 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Area and productivity differed prominently among agro-climatic regions.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
disparity in area and productivitye0
Setting
agro-climatic regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All agro-climatic regions showed prominent disparity in area and productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malwa plateau had the largest area increase, 420.03 thousand ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
420.03 thousand hae0
Setting
Malwa plateaue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum area increased in Malwa plateau (420.03 thousand ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Satpura hills area decreased by 57.43 thousand ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
decreasede0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
-57.43 thousand hae0
Comparator
base yeare0
Setting
Satpura hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas decreased in Satpura hills (-57.43 thousand ha) compared with base year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jhabua hills had a 241.18% relative area increase.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
241.18%e0
Setting
Jhabua hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trend of relative changes was obtained in area higher of Jhabua hills (241.18%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Satpura plateau area declined by 24.55%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
declinede0
Direction
declinede0
Value
-24.55%e0
Setting
Satpura plateaue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while declined in Satpura plateau (-24.55%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gird productivity increased by 128.44%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
128.44%e0
Setting
Gird regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative changes in productivity was increased of Gird region (128.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vindhyan plateau productivity declined by 14.40%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
declinede0
Direction
declinede0
Value
-14.40%e0
Setting
Vindhyan plateaue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas declined in Vindhyan plateau (-14.40%) compared of base year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad bed and furrow sowing under excess moisture raised yield by 74.7%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
BBFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
74.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these conditions, crop sown by BBF increased yield by 74.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JG-14 under drought raised grain yield by 18.5%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
JG-14e0
Treatment
using drought tolerant cultivar JG-14e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
18.5%e0
Qualifier
drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum increases in grain yield was using drought tolerant cultivar JG-14 (18.5%) under drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Advanced zero tillage sowing raised grain yield by 22.2% under terminal heat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
advance sowing with ZTe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adverse effect of terminal heat reduced by advance sowing with ZT just after harvest of Kharif crops, resulting increased of grain yield by 22.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF sowing of JG-11 diminished root rot and raised grain yield by 37.7%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
JG-11e0
Treatment
BBF sowing of JG-11 cultivare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.7%e0
Qualifier
root rot effect was diminishede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root rot effect was diminished by BBF sowing of JG-11 cultivar increased grain yield by 37.7% over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer deep tillage and JG-11 reduced wilt and raised yield by 37.5%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
JG-11e0
Treatment
summer deep tillage and sowing resistant cultivar JG-11e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.5%e0
Qualifier
Wilt infestation under rainfed situations was reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wilt infestation under rainfed situations was reduced by summer deep tillage and sowing resistant cultivar JG-11 resulted increased in yield by 37.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF and Mencozeb spray increased grain yield by 38.1% against cercospora disease.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
BBF and spray of Mencozeb 3 g lit.-1 watere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
38.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase of 38.1% grain yield by crop sown with BBF and spray of Mencozeb 3 g lit.-1 water at appearance of cerecospora disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1899 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved mitigation techniques gave higher net returns and benefit cost ratio than control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalitiese0
Outcome
net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using improved techniques for mitigation of climatic abnormalities gave higher net returns and B:C ratio compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2036 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

climate site · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.