Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Integrated Management of Bulb Rot (Fusarium proliferatum) of Garlic (Allium sativum L.)

Avinash Patil; Sobita Simon; Girish Patil

11
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Garlic (Allium sativum L.) is the second most widely used Allium next to onion belonging to the family Amaryllidaceae. Garlic crop is affected by several fungal, bacterial and viral diseases, of which, bulb rot is caused by Fusarium proliferatum. Damage caused by this pathogen can causes 45% yield losses. The research was carried out for the management of bulb rot using organic amendments. Five organic amendments and a fungicide (treated check) were evaluated for their efficacy under in vitro and in vivo against bulb rot of garlic incited by Fusarium proliferatum, Carbendazim @ 0.1% as treated control was effective in the inhibition of mycelial growth (100%) of F. proliferatum followed by T3(Neem cake-46.98%), T5(Mustard cake-44.72%), T1(Vermicompost-37.68%), T2(FYM-34.29%), T4(Poultry manure-28.89%). The organic amendments and a fungicide (treated check) were tested against bulb rot under field conditions during Rabi 2017-2018. Among all the treatments, soil drenching with carbendazim @ 2g/lit (Treated check) was found most effective in the reduction of disease incidence followed by Neem cake, Vermicompost, FYM, Mustard cake and Poultry manure as compared to untreated check. The maximum yield was recorded in (FYM-51q/ha). The maximum number of cloves and bulb weight was recorded in FYM and bulb size was maximum in vermicompost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim inhibited F. proliferatum mycelial growth by 100%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Carbendazim @ 0.1%e0
Interactor
F. proliferatumFusarium proliferatume0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbendazim @ 0.1% as treated control was effective in the inhibition of mycelial growth (100%) of F. proliferatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 46.98%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Neem cakee0
Interactor
F. proliferatumFusarium proliferatume1pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe1
Value
46.98%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T3(Neem cake-46.98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“mycelial growth (100%) of F. proliferatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard cake inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 44.72%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Mustard cakee0
Interactor
F. proliferatumFusarium proliferatume1pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe1
Value
44.72%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T5(Mustard cake-44.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“mycelial growth (100%) of F. proliferatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 37.68%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Interactor
F. proliferatumFusarium proliferatume1pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe1
Value
37.68%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1(Vermicompost-37.68%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“mycelial growth (100%) of F. proliferatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 34.29%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
FYMe0
Interactor
F. proliferatumFusarium proliferatume1pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe1
Value
34.29%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2(FYM-34.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“mycelial growth (100%) of F. proliferatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure inhibited fungal mycelial growth by 28.89%.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Poultry manuree0
Interactor
F. proliferatumFusarium proliferatume1pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growthe1
Value
28.89%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4(Poultry manure-28.89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“mycelial growth (100%) of F. proliferatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim was most effective at reducing field bulb rot incidence.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
soil drenching with carbendazim @ 2g/lite0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
untreated checke1

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil drenching with carbendazim @ 2g/lit (Treated check) was found most effective in the reduction of disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake, vermicompost, FYM, mustard cake and poultry manure followed carbendazim for disease reduction.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Neem cake, Vermicompost, FYM, Mustard cake and Poultry manuree0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction of disease incidence followed by Neem cake, Vermicompost, FYM, Mustard cake and Poultry manure as compared to untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM produced the maximum yield of 51 q/ha.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
51q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield was recorded in (FYM-51q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM gave the maximum number of cloves and bulb weight.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
number of cloves and bulb weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of cloves and bulb weight was recorded in FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost gave the maximum bulb size.

Taxon
GarlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
bulb sizee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb size was maximum in vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · disease · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · disease · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · Fusarium proliferatum · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · disease · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.