Paper · 2017

Participatory Varietal and Adoption Appraisal on Summer Vegetables Cultivation among Tribal Farmers of Odisha

Jyotshnarani Maharana; P. Acharya; Praveen Jakhar; et al.

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Semiliguda in Koraput district of Odisha from 2009–14 to evaluate the performance of improved cowpea and cauliflower varieties Utkal Manik and Sarita on farmers’ field. The average increase in yield under cowpea demonstrations was 31% for variety Utkal Manik over local cultivars. The additional cost of cultivation in off-season cowpea demonstration plots was higher (Average Rs. 2873/ha) in comparison to FP. This in turn gave additional net returns to the tune of Rs. 10,600-18,900/ha. Adoption behaviour analysis showed that 40% of the recommended practices like lime application, sowing time, critical irrigation and grading were adopted by the respondents mediocrely; with AQ of 70.0, 71.1, 69.4 and 68.9 respectively. Cauliflower cultivar Sarita recorded increase in yield to the tune of 65 to 70% (2012–14) over local cultivars. Off-season cauliflower cultivation escalated the cost of cultivation by Rs. 3816/ha. Net returns to the tune of Rs. 3,23,484/ha were obtained which is 88% higher than the FP. Scientifically recommended practices for off-season cauliflower cultivation showed that sowing time, critical irrigation, boron application and curd packing scored AQ values to the tune of 64.4, 69.4, 57.8 and 63.3, respectively. Form the demonstration trial it can be inferred that extension agency contacts with farmers should be reinforced for higher adoption of improved production technologies and cultivars for off-season summer vegetable cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea variety Utkal Manik gave a 31% average yield increase over local cultivars in demonstrations.

Material
Utkal Manike1
Treatment
variety Utkal Manike1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
31%e1
Comparator
local cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average increase in yield under cowpea demonstrations was 31% for variety Utkal Manik over local cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Off-season cowpea demonstration plots had higher cost of cultivation than farmers practice.

Treatment
off-season cowpea demonstration plotse2
Outcome
cost of cultivatione2
Direction
highere2
Value
Average Rs. 2873/hae2
Comparator
FPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The additional cost of cultivation in off-season cowpea demonstration plots was higher (Average Rs. 2873/ha) in comparison to FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea demonstrations gave additional net returns of Rs. 10,600-18,900/ha.

Outcome
additional net returnse3
Value
Rs. 10,600-18,900/hae3
Setting
farmers’ fielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“evaluate the performance of improved cowpea and cauliflower varieties Utkal Manik and Sarita on farmers’ field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–214 · show in text ↑
e3

“This in turn gave additional net returns to the tune of Rs. 10,600-18,900/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–534 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 40% of recommended practices were adopted mediocrely by the respondents.

Taxon
summer vegetablest0
Outcome
recommended practicese4
Value
40%e4
Qualifier
AQ of 70.0, 71.1, 69.4 and 68.9 respectivelye4

Verbatim

t0

“Summer Vegetables Cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“Adoption behaviour analysis showed that 40% of the recommended practices like lime application, sowing time, critical irrigation and grading were adopted by the respondents mediocrely; with AQ of 70.0, 71.1, 69.4 and 68.9 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cauliflower cultivar Sarita increased yield by 65 to 70% over local cultivars in 2012–14.

Material
Saritae5
Treatment
Cauliflower cultivar Saritae5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Value
65 to 70%e5
Qualifier
2012–14e5
Comparator
local cultivarse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Cauliflower cultivar Sarita recorded increase in yield to the tune of 65 to 70% (2012–14) over local cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Off-season cauliflower cultivation raised the cost of cultivation by Rs. 3816/ha.

Treatment
Off-season cauliflower cultivatione6
Outcome
cost of cultivatione6
Direction
escalatede6
Value
Rs. 3816/hae6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Off-season cauliflower cultivation escalated the cost of cultivation by Rs. 3816/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Off-season cauliflower cultivation gave net returns 88% higher than farmers practice.

Treatment
Off-season cauliflower cultivatione6
Outcome
net returnse7
Direction
highere7
Value
88%e7
Qualifier
Rs. 3,23,484/hae7
Comparator
FPe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Off-season cauliflower cultivation escalated the cost of cultivation by Rs. 3816/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–967 · show in text ↑
e7

“Net returns to the tune of Rs. 3,23,484/ha were obtained which is 88% higher than the FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scientifically recommended practices for off-season cauliflower scored AQ values of 57.8 to 69.4.

Outcome
Scientifically recommended practicese7
Qualifier
AQ values to the tune of 64.4, 69.4, 57.8 and 63.3, respectivelye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Scientifically recommended practices for off-season cauliflower cultivation showed that sowing time, critical irrigation, boron application and curd packing scored AQ values to the tune of 64.4, 69.4, 57.8 and 63.3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1287 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Extension agency contacts with farmers should be reinforced for higher adoption of improved summer vegetable technologies and cultivars.

Taxon
summer vegetablee7
Outcome
higher adoption of improved production technologies and cultivarse7

Verbatim

e7

“extension agency contacts with farmers should be reinforced for higher adoption of improved production technologies and cultivars for off-season summer vegetable cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1515 · show in text ↑

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.