Abstract
Abstract Background Two cultivars (Balady and Dukat) of dill plants were grown in the Experimental Farm Station of Agriculture Faculty, Cairo University, during two seasons of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016. This investigation aims to determine the response of two dill cultivars to seven fertilizer treatments, i.e., control, 100% mineral fertilizer, 100% biofertilizer, 100% organic fertilizer, 50% organic fertilizer, 100% organic fertilizer with biofertilizer, and 50% organic fertilizer with biofertilizer. Data on plant height, leaf number, and some chemical composition such as antioxidant and nitrate accumulation were recorded in the vegetative growth stage. Results The results demonstrated that dill cv. Dukat gave the highest plants (cm), maximum leaf number per plant, pigment content (mg/g), total carbohydrates (%), nitrogen, and phosphorus percentages in the vegetative growth stage. Meanwhile, dill cv. Balady recorded the maximum potassium percentage and low content of nitrate accumulation (mg/kg) in the vegetative growth stage. Both dill cultivars contained antioxidants without significant differences between them. The best fertilization treatments were 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizer for plant height (cm), leaf number per plant, pigment content, antioxidant percentage, total carbohydrate percentage, and N and P percentages of two dill genotypes. On the other hand, 50% organic fertilization with biofertilizers was recorded as the best treatment for nitrate accumulation and K percentage with two dill cultivars. Conclusion These results prove that chemical fertilizers could be completely replaced by organic sources supplemented by NPK Symbion without any negative effect on dill vegetative growth and or nutrient contents.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Dill cultivar Dukat had the highest plants and the maximum leaf number per plant in the vegetative growth stage.
- Taxon
- dill
Anethum graveolense0 - Material
- Dukate0
- Outcome
- highest plants (cm), maximum leaf number per plante1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dill cv. Dukat”
e1“highest plants (cm), maximum leaf number per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Dill cultivar Dukat had the highest pigment content and total carbohydrates in the vegetative growth stage.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolense0
- Material
- Dukate0
- Outcome
- pigment content (mg/g), total carbohydrates (%)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dill cv. Dukat”
e1“pigment content (mg/g), total carbohydrates (%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dill cultivar Dukat had the highest nitrogen and phosphorus percentages in the vegetative growth stage.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolense0
- Material
- Dukate0
- Outcome
- nitrogen, and phosphorus percentagese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dill cv. Dukat”
e1“nitrogen, and phosphorus percentages in the vegetative growth stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Dill cultivar Balady recorded the maximum potassium percentage in the vegetative growth stage.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolense0
- Material
- Baladye0
- Outcome
- maximum potassium percentagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dill cv. Balady”
e1“maximum potassium percentage”
Claim · model-written summary
Dill cultivar Balady had a low content of nitrate accumulation (mg/kg) in the vegetative growth stage.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolense0
- Material
- Baladye0
- Outcome
- low content of nitrate accumulation (mg/kg)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dill cv. Balady”
e1“low content of nitrate accumulation (mg/kg)”
Claim · model-written summary
Both dill cultivars contained antioxidants, without significant differences between them.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolense0
- Outcome
- antioxidantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both dill cultivars contained antioxidants without significant differences between them”
Claim · model-written summary
The best treatments for plant height and leaf number per plant of the two dill genotypes were 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizer.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- plant height (cm), leaf number per plante1
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens)”
e0“The best fertilization treatments were 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizer”
e1“plant height (cm), leaf number per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
The best treatments for pigment content, antioxidant percentage and total carbohydrate percentage of the two dill genotypes were 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizer.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- pigment content, antioxidant percentage, total carbohydrate percentagee1
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens)”
e0“The best fertilization treatments were 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizer”
e1“pigment content, antioxidant percentage, total carbohydrate percentage”
Claim · model-written summary
The best treatments for N and P percentages of the two dill genotypes were 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizer.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- N and P percentagese1
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens)”
e0“The best fertilization treatments were 100% organic fertilization with biofertilizer and 100% chemical fertilizer”
e1“N and P percentages”
Claim · model-written summary
50% organic fertilization with biofertilizers was the best treatment for nitrate accumulation and K percentage in the two dill cultivars.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- 50% organic fertilization with biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- nitrate accumulation and K percentagee0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens)”
e0“50% organic fertilization with biofertilizers was recorded as the best treatment for nitrate accumulation and K percentage”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that chemical fertilizers could be completely replaced by organic sources supplemented by NPK Symbion without negative effect on dill vegetative growth or nutrient contents.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolense0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth and or nutrient contentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chemical fertilizers could be completely replaced by organic sources supplemented by NPK Symbion without any negative effect on dill vegetative growth and or nutrient contents”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: content · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · nutrient: content · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · physiology: pigments · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
fertilization · growth · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.