Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECTS OF FERTILIZATION AND PACKING TREATMENTS ON STORABILITY OF Anethum graveolens HERB

Fardous Menesy,; E. El-Mahrouk; Mahassen Sidky; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study was conducted during two successive seasons (1999-2000 and 2000-2001) to investigate the effect of packing material and storage duration on the quality of Anethum graveolens fresh herb. The plants were grown under different fertilization regimes that may also have impact in this respect. The fresh herb was packed in either perforated or non-perforated polyethylene bags and stored at 0ºC and 98% relative humidity for either 15, 30 or 40 days. The stored herb was investigated with regard to weight loss, respiration rate, as well as its contents of vitamin C, chlorophyll (a and b), N, P, and K. The results revealed that the most proper storage period should not exceed than 30 days, since longer periods negatively affected the studied compounds of the herb. The non-perforated packages proved to be better than the perforated one, it help in keeping the herb freshness and chemical composition. Herb collected from plants received organic manure plus bio-fertilizers was the best compared to that received other fertilization treatments. Under such treatment the herb kept its contents of chlorophyll (a and b), vitamin C and minerals at their highest levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh dill herb should not be stored longer than 30 days.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Outcome
storage period should not exceed than 30 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anethum graveolens fresh herb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that the most proper storage period should not exceed than 30 days, since longer periods negatively affected the studied compounds of the herb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer storage periods negatively affected the studied compounds of dill herb.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
longer periodse1
Outcome
the studied compoundse1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anethum graveolens fresh herb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that the most proper storage period should not exceed than 30 days, since longer periods negatively affected the studied compounds of the herb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-perforated packages kept dill herb freshness and chemical composition better than perforated packages.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
non-perforated packagese2
Outcome
herb freshness and chemical compositione2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
perforated onee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anethum graveolens fresh herb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–202 · show in text ↑
e2

“The non-perforated packages proved to be better than the perforated one, it help in keeping the herb freshness and chemical composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure plus bio-fertilizers gave dill herb the highest chlorophyll, vitamin C and mineral contents among fertilization treatments.

Taxon
Anethum graveolensAnethum graveolense0
Treatment
organic manure plus bio-fertilizerse1
Outcome
chlorophyll (a and b), vitamin C and mineralse4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
other fertilization treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anethum graveolens fresh herb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herb collected from plants received organic manure plus bio-fertilizers was the best compared to that received other fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1060 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under such treatment the herb kept its contents of chlorophyll (a and b), vitamin C and minerals at their highest levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1182 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.