Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of biochar, lime and soil test value based fertilizer application on soil fertility, nutrient uptake and yield of rice-cowpea cropping system in an acid soil of Karnataka

Hari Mohan Meena; H. C. Prakasha

18
claims
26
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif and Summer seasons for two consecutive years of 2016-17 and 2017-18 with rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.), grown in a sequence at Zonal Agricultural Research Station, Mandya on an acid soil to study the effect of biochar, lime and mangala setright on yield, nutrient uptake and fertility status of an acidic soil. Application of biochar along with soil test value based fertilizer (STV) + FYM + ZnSO4 influenced the productivity of rice and cowpea of 104.82 q ha−1 and 2474.77 kg ha−1, respectively and the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly, which was found on par with application of biochar along with RDF + FYM + ZnSO4. The soil pH (6.01), organic carbon content (5.03 g kg−1) and available nitrogen (340.45 kg ha−1), phosphorus (39.45 kg ha−1) and potassium (166.45 kg ha−1) significantly increased through the integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers. Yield and soil properties like soil pH, organic carbon content and available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium significantly increased with application of lime and mangala setright as compared to farmer’s practice. Highest net income and benefit:cost ratio (2.65) was obtained with integration of soil test value based fertilizer application, FYM and biochar. Significant reduction in the productivity of crop and soil fertility was recorded in farmer’s practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with soil-test-based fertilizer, FYM and ZnSO4 influenced rice productivity of 104.82 q ha-1.

Treatment
Application of biochar along with soil test value based fertilizer (STV) + FYM + ZnSO4e2
Outcome
productivitye2
Value
104.82 q ha−1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of biochar along with soil test value based fertilizer (STV) + FYM + ZnSO4 influenced the productivity of rice and cowpea of 104.82 q ha−1 and 2474.77 kg ha−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with soil-test-based fertilizer, FYM and ZnSO4 influenced cowpea productivity of 2474.77 kg ha-1.

Treatment
Application of biochar along with soil test value based fertilizer (STV) + FYM + ZnSO4e2
Outcome
productivitye2
Value
2474.77 kg ha−1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–176 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of biochar along with soil test value based fertilizer (STV) + FYM + ZnSO4 influenced the productivity of rice and cowpea of 104.82 q ha−1 and 2474.77 kg ha−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen uptake was 107.72 under the integrated treatments.

Outcome
uptake of nitrogene3
Value
107.72e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice phosphorus uptake was 28.16 under the integrated treatments.

Outcome
phosphoruse3
Value
28.16e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice potassium uptake was 69.34 under the integrated treatments.

Outcome
potassiume3
Value
69.34e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea nitrogen uptake was 68.06 under the integrated treatments.

Outcome
uptake of nitrogene3
Value
68.06e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea phosphorus uptake was 5.86 under the integrated treatments.

Outcome
phosphoruse3
Value
5.86e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–749 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea potassium uptake was 38.67 under the integrated treatments.

Outcome
potassiume3
Value
38.67e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers significantly increased soil pH to 6.01.

Treatment
integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizerse4
Outcome
soil pHe4
Direction
increasede4
Value
6.01e4

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The soil pH (6.01), organic carbon content (5.03 g kg−1) and available nitrogen (340.45 kg ha−1), phosphorus (39.45 kg ha−1) and potassium (166.45 kg ha−1) significantly increased through the integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers significantly increased soil organic carbon to 5.03 g kg-1.

Treatment
integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizerse4
Outcome
organic carbon contente4
Direction
increasede4
Value
5.03 g kg−1e4

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The soil pH (6.01), organic carbon content (5.03 g kg−1) and available nitrogen (340.45 kg ha−1), phosphorus (39.45 kg ha−1) and potassium (166.45 kg ha−1) significantly increased through the integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers significantly increased available nitrogen to 340.45 kg ha-1.

Treatment
integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizerse4
Outcome
available nitrogene4
Direction
increasede4
Value
340.45 kg ha−1e4

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The soil pH (6.01), organic carbon content (5.03 g kg−1) and available nitrogen (340.45 kg ha−1), phosphorus (39.45 kg ha−1) and potassium (166.45 kg ha−1) significantly increased through the integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers significantly increased available phosphorus to 39.45 kg ha-1.

Treatment
integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizerse4
Outcome
phosphoruse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
39.45 kg ha−1e4

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The soil pH (6.01), organic carbon content (5.03 g kg−1) and available nitrogen (340.45 kg ha−1), phosphorus (39.45 kg ha−1) and potassium (166.45 kg ha−1) significantly increased through the integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers significantly increased available potassium to 166.45 kg ha-1.

Treatment
integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizerse4
Outcome
potassiume4
Direction
increasede4
Value
166.45 kg ha−1e4

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4

“The soil pH (6.01), organic carbon content (5.03 g kg−1) and available nitrogen (340.45 kg ha−1), phosphorus (39.45 kg ha−1) and potassium (166.45 kg ha−1) significantly increased through the integrated use of biochar, FYM, ZnSO4 and fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and mangala setright application significantly increased yield and soil properties compared with farmer practice.

Treatment
application of lime and mangala setrighte5
Outcome
Yield and soil propertiese5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
farmer’s practicee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–176 · show in text ↑
e5

“Yield and soil properties like soil pH, organic carbon content and available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium significantly increased with application of lime and mangala setright as compared to farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration of soil-test-based fertilizer, FYM and biochar gave a benefit:cost ratio of 2.65.

Treatment
integration of soil test value based fertilizer application, FYM and biochare6
Outcome
benefit:cost ratioe6
Value
2.65e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–176 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highest net income and benefit:cost ratio (2.65) was obtained with integration of soil test value based fertilizer application, FYM and biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration of soil-test-based fertilizer, FYM and biochar gave the highest net income.

Treatment
integration of soil test value based fertilizer application, FYM and biochare6
Outcome
net incomee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–176 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highest net income and benefit:cost ratio (2.65) was obtained with integration of soil test value based fertilizer application, FYM and biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmer practice significantly reduced crop productivity and soil fertility.

Treatment
farmer’s practicee7
Outcome
productivity of crop and soil fertilitye7
Direction
reductione7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–176 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant reduction in the productivity of crop and soil fertility was recorded in farmer’s practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated soil-test-based fertilizer with biochar gave uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on par with the RDF-based biochar treatment.

Treatment
Application of biochar along with soil test value based fertilizer (STV) + FYM + ZnSO4e2
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassiume3
Direction
on pare4
Comparator
application of biochar along with RDF + FYM + ZnSO4e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Application of biochar along with soil test value based fertilizer (STV) + FYM + ZnSO4 influenced the productivity of rice and cowpea of 104.82 q ha−1 and 2474.77 kg ha−1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–569 · show in text ↑
e3

“the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium by rice (107.72, 28.16 and 69.34 kg ha−1, respectively) and cowpea (68.06, 5.86 and 38.67 kg ha−1, respectively) significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–749 · show in text ↑
e4

“which was found on par with application of biochar along with RDF + FYM + ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–830 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 60 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

lime · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

136 papers: 123 positive, 13 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

132 papers more in this group

See all 136 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 81 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 932 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.