Paper · 2018 · Sustainability

The Short-Term Effects of Rice Straw Biochar, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field

Linlin Si; Yinan Xie; Qingxu Ma; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
98
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crop productivity in cold waterlogged paddy fields can be constrained by chronic flooding stress and low temperature. Farmers typically use chemical fertilizer to improve crop production, but this conventional fertilization is not very effective in a cold waterlogged paddy field. Biochar amendment has been proposed as a promising management approach to eliminating these obstacles. However, little is known about the performance of biochar when combined with N fertilizer and P fertilizer in cold waterlogged soils. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the main effects and interactive effects of rice straw biochar, N and P fertilizer on rice growth and soil properties in a cold waterlogged paddy field. The field treatments consisted of a factorial combination of two biochar levels (0 and 2.25 t ha−1), two N fertilizer levels (120.0 and 180.0 kg ha−1) and two P fertilizer levels (37.5 and 67.5 kg ha−1) which were arranged in a randomized block design, with three replicates. Results confirmed that biochar application caused a significant increase in the soil pH due to its liming effect, while this application resulted in a significant decrease in soil exchangeable cations, such as exchangeable Ca, Mg, Al and base cations. The interactive effect of N fertilizer, P fertilizer and biochar was significant for soil total N. Moreover, a negative effect of biochar on the internal K use efficiency suggested that K uptake into rice may benefit from biochar application. According to the partial Eta squared values, the combined application of N fertilizer and biochar was as effective as pure P fertilization at increasing straw P uptake. The addition of biochar to farmers’ fertilization practice treatment (180.0 kg N ha−1, 67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 67.5 kg K2O ha−1) significantly increased rice yield, mainly owing to improvements in grains per panicle. However, notable effects of biochar on rice yield and biomass production were not detected. More studies are required to assess the long-term behavior of biochar in a cold waterlogged paddy field. This study may lay a theoretical foundation for blended application of biochar with fertilizer in a cold waterlogged paddy field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application significantly increased soil pH through its liming effect.

Treatment
biochar applicatione1
Outcome
soil pHe1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“biochar application caused a significant increase in the soil pH due to its liming effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application significantly decreased soil exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, Al and base cations).

Treatment
biochar applicatione2
Outcome
soil exchangeable cationse2
Direction
decreasee2
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“biochar application caused a significant increase in the soil pH due to its liming effect, while this application resulted in a significant decrease in soil exchangeable cations, such as exchangeable Ca, Mg, Al and base cations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interactive effect of N fertilizer, P fertilizer and biochar was significant for soil total N.

Treatment
N fertilizer, P fertilizer and biochare3
Outcome
soil total Ne3
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The interactive effect of N fertilizer, P fertilizer and biochar was significant for soil total N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar lowered the internal K use efficiency of rice, which the authors read as a sign that K uptake may benefit from biochar.

Treatment
biochare4
Outcome
internal K use efficiencye4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“a negative effect of biochar on the internal K use efficiency suggested that K uptake into rice may benefit from biochar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined N fertilizer and biochar was as effective as pure P fertilization at increasing straw P uptake.

Treatment
combined application of N fertilizer and biochare5
Outcome
straw P uptakee5
Direction
increasinge5
Comparator
pure P fertilizatione5
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the combined application of N fertilizer and biochar was as effective as pure P fertilization at increasing straw P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar to the farmers’ fertilization practice significantly increased rice yield.

Treatment
addition of biochare6
Outcome
rice yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
farmers’ fertilization practice treatmente6
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The addition of biochar to farmers’ fertilization practice treatment (180.0 kg N ha−1, 67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 67.5 kg K2O ha−1) significantly increased rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice yield increase from biochar was mainly owing to more grains per panicle.

Treatment
addition of biochare6
Outcome
rice yielde6
Qualifier
improvements in grains per paniclee7
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The addition of biochar to farmers’ fertilization practice treatment (180.0 kg N ha−1, 67.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 67.5 kg K2O ha−1) significantly increased rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1820 · show in text ↑
e7

“mainly owing to improvements in grains per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar had no notable effect on rice yield or biomass production.

Treatment
biochare1
Outcome
rice yield and biomass productione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Setting
cold waterlogged paddy fieldt0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“notable effects of biochar on rice yield and biomass production were not detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–1964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Yield and Soil Properties in a Cold Waterlogged Paddy Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–148 · show in text ↑

biochar · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 81 positive, 5 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

biochar · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 135 positive, 12 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.