Paper · 2018 · Bangladesh Journal of Botany

Effects of rhizobial nod factors (Lipo chitooligosaccharide) on seedling growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under salt stress

D. Udhaya Nandhini; E. Somasundaram

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of nod factors (lipo chitooligosaccharide) on seedling growth of maize under salt stress have been studied. The study was framed with seed priming using lipo chitooligosaccharide (LCO) a nod factor @ 4 ml/kg of seeds and without priming on maize seedling growth which was exposed to different levels of salinity (0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 dS/m). Salinity negatively influenced the seedling growth of maize. However nod factor treated maize seedlings had relatively higher germination percentage, root length, shoot length, reducing sugars and amylase activity. Correlation analysis revealed positive relationships between seedling growth parameters. Thus, seed priming with nod factor (4 ml/kg) improved the resistance to salinity at seedling stage. NaCl concentrations restricted amylase enzyme activity and reducing sugar content in the germinating seeds. Priming of nod factor/LCO mitigated the restricted effects of salinity on amylase activity and reducing sugars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced maize seedling growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
negatively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity negatively influenced the seedling growth of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nod-factor-treated maize seedlings had higher germination percentage, root length and shoot length.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nod factore0
Outcome
germination percentage, root length, shoot lengthe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nod factor treated maize seedlings had relatively higher germination percentage, root length, shoot length, reducing sugars and amylase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nod-factor-treated maize seedlings had higher reducing sugars and amylase activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nod factore0
Outcome
reducing sugars and amylase activitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nod factor treated maize seedlings had relatively higher germination percentage, root length, shoot length, reducing sugars and amylase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–562 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling growth parameters were positively correlated.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Outcome
seedling growth parameterse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Correlation analysis revealed positive relationships between seedling growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCO seed priming improved salinity resistance at the seedling stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Treatment
seed priming with nod factor (4 ml/kg)e0
Outcome
resistance to salinitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed priming with nod factor (4 ml/kg) improved the resistance to salinity at seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl restricted amylase activity and reducing sugar content in germinating seeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
germinating seedse0
Treatment
NaCl concentrationse0
Outcome
amylase enzyme activity and reducing sugar contente0
Direction
restrictede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“NaCl concentrations restricted amylase enzyme activity and reducing sugar content in the germinating seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LCO priming mitigated salinity restrictions on amylase activity and reducing sugars.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Priming of nod factor/LCOe0
Outcome
amylase activity and reducing sugarse0
Direction
mitigatede0
Qualifier
effects of salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Priming of nod factor/LCO mitigated the restricted effects of salinity on amylase activity and reducing sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–971 · show in text ↑

nodulation factor · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nodulation factor · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sodium chloride · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 44 positive, 5 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

salinity · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 26 positive, 231 negative or no effect

230 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: enzyme activity · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.