Paper · 1997 · Journal of natural resources and life sciences education

An Inexpensive Setup for Assessing the Impact of Ambient Solar Ultraviolet Radiation on Seedlings

Paulien Adamse; Herbert E. Reed; Donald T. Krizek; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Because of reductions in stratospheric ozone levels due to chlorofluoromethanes and other trace gases, there has been growing concern about the impact of possible increases in ultraviolet‐B (UV‐B) radiation. Until recently, most studies have focused on the effects of enhanced UV‐B levels, however, these have inherent technical difficulties. Ultraviolet‐B exclusion studies afford the investigator a rapid means of assessing the effects of present levels of solar UV‐B radiation. Unlike UV‐B enhancement, UV‐B exclusion studies use the sun as the source of UV‐B radiation and selective filters to transmit or absorb this portion of sunlight. This article describes a simple, inexpensive system that was used over a 3‐yr period to determine seedling response of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and New Zealand spinach [( Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pallas) Kuntze] to UV‐B exclusion. Plants of all three species grown outdoors under UV‐B absorbing polyester showed an increase in leaf enlargement and biomass accumulation in comparison to those grown under UV‐B transmitting cellulose acetate filters. The basic materials used consist of plastic window boxes, plastic filters that transmit or absorb in the UV‐B region, wire supports, and binder clips. This setup can be used to demonstrate basic principles of photobiology and stress physiology. It is ideal for students interested in conducting short‐term science projects on the effects of solar UV radiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber seedlings grown outdoors under UV-B absorbing polyester showed increased leaf enlargement and biomass accumulation compared with UV-B transmitting cellulose acetate filters.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
UV‐B absorbing polyestere2
Outcome
leaf enlargement and biomass accumulatione2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
UV‐B transmitting cellulose acetate filterse2
Setting
outdoorse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“seedling response of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and New Zealand spinach [( Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pallas) Kuntze] to UV‐B exclusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–924 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants of all three species grown outdoors under UV‐B absorbing polyester showed an increase in leaf enlargement and biomass accumulation in comparison to those grown under UV‐B transmitting cellulose acetate filters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seedlings grown outdoors under UV-B absorbing polyester showed increased leaf enlargement and biomass accumulation compared with UV-B transmitting cellulose acetate filters.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
UV‐B absorbing polyestere2
Outcome
leaf enlargement and biomass accumulatione2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
UV‐B transmitting cellulose acetate filterse2
Setting
outdoorse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“seedling response of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and New Zealand spinach [( Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pallas) Kuntze] to UV‐B exclusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–924 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants of all three species grown outdoors under UV‐B absorbing polyester showed an increase in leaf enlargement and biomass accumulation in comparison to those grown under UV‐B transmitting cellulose acetate filters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New Zealand spinach seedlings grown outdoors under UV-B absorbing polyester showed increased leaf enlargement and biomass accumulation compared with UV-B transmitting cellulose acetate filters.

Taxon
New Zealand spinache1
Treatment
UV‐B absorbing polyestere2
Outcome
leaf enlargement and biomass accumulatione2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
UV‐B transmitting cellulose acetate filterse2
Setting
outdoorse2

Verbatim

e1

“seedling response of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and New Zealand spinach [( Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pallas) Kuntze] to UV‐B exclusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–924 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants of all three species grown outdoors under UV‐B absorbing polyester showed an increase in leaf enlargement and biomass accumulation in comparison to those grown under UV‐B transmitting cellulose acetate filters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1142 · show in text ↑

uv · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

39 papers: 10 positive, 29 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

uv · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

50 papers: 9 positive, 41 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.