Paper · 2020 · Biocontrol Science and Technology

Role of bacterial antagonists of fungal pathogens, Bacillus thuringiensis KYC and Bacillus velezensis CE 100 in control of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita and subsequent growth promotion of tomato

Tae Gyu Choi; Chaw Ei Htwe Maung; Dong Ryul Lee; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, the biocontrol ability of bacterial antagonists of fungal pathogens, B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 was investigated for the inhibition of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, and subsequent growth promotion of tomato. Based on the results of dual-culture assay, both Bacillus strains showed antagonistic activities against six different phytopathogenic fungi. The bacterial culture filtrates (BCF) of two Bacillus strains had a strong toxic effect on egg hatching and second-stage juvenile (J2) survival of M. incognita. With increasing concentration of BCF and incubation period, the hatching rate of the nematode egg was significantly inhibited and J2 mortality was remarkably increased. Moreover, the crude enzymes which were extracted from culture supernatants of two Bacillus strains caused structural damage to nematode eggs and J2 at 1, 3 and 5 days after inoculation. The pot experiment revealed that B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 significantly promoted tomato shoot growth compared to fertiliser treatment. However, root fresh weight was significantly increased in fertiliser treatment due to numerous masses in roots. The number of egg masses and root gall index in the treatment group with both Bacillus strains were significantly decreased compared to those in fertiliser treatment. Higher populations of B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 (4.12 and 6.52 × 106 CFU g−1of soil) were detected in the tomato rhizosphere. These results demonstrated the potential of B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 as biocontrol agents to control plant-pathogenic fungi and root-knot nematode and as biofertilisers to promote plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Bacillus strains showed antagonistic activity against six phytopathogenic fungi in dual-culture assays.

Interactor
phytopathogenic fungie0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic activities against six different phytopathogenic fungie0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Based on the results of dual-culture assay, both Bacillus strains showed antagonistic activities against six different phytopathogenic fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial culture filtrates of the two Bacillus strains had a strong toxic effect on egg hatching and second-stage juvenile survival of M. incognita.

Treatment
bacterial culture filtrates (BCF)e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus strainse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg hatching and second-stage juvenile (J2) survivale0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial culture filtrates (BCF) of two Bacillus strains had a strong toxic effect on egg hatching and second-stage juvenile (J2) survival of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With increasing BCF concentration and incubation period, the hatching rate of nematode eggs was significantly inhibited.

Treatment
increasing concentration of BCFe0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
hatching rate of the nematode egge0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing concentration of BCF and incubation period, the hatching rate of the nematode egg was significantly inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With increasing BCF concentration and incubation period, J2 mortality was remarkably increased.

Outcome
J2 mortalitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“J2 mortality was remarkably increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude enzymes from culture supernatants of the two Bacillus strains caused structural damage to nematode eggs and J2.

Treatment
crude enzymese0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
structural damage to nematode eggs and J2e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the crude enzymes which were extracted from culture supernatants of two Bacillus strains caused structural damage to nematode eggs and J2 at 1, 3 and 5 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 significantly promoted tomato shoot growth compared with fertiliser treatment in the pot experiment.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100e0
Interactor
B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100Bacillus thuringiensisBacillus velezensise0other
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
fertiliser treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 significantly promoted tomato shoot growth compared to fertiliser treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1067 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato root fresh weight was significantly increased in the fertiliser treatment, due to numerous egg masses in roots.

Treatment
fertiliser treatmente0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 200–206 · show in text ↑
e0

“root fresh weight was significantly increased in fertiliser treatment due to numerous masses in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of egg masses and the root gall index were significantly lower in the treatment groups with both Bacillus strains than in the fertiliser treatment.

Treatment
both Bacillus strainse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pest
Outcome
number of egg masses and root gall indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
fertiliser treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 200–206 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–164 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of egg masses and root gall index in the treatment group with both Bacillus strains were significantly decreased compared to those in fertiliser treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1346 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. thuringiensis KYC reached a higher population of 4.12 x 10^6 CFU per g soil in the tomato rhizosphere.

Interactor
B. thuringiensis KYCBacillus thuringiensise0other
Outcome
populations of B. thuringiensis KYCe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
4.12e0
Setting
tomato rhizospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · InteractorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher populations of B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 (4.12 and 6.52 × 106 CFU g−1of soil) were detected in the tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1492 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. velezensis CE 100 reached a higher population of 6.52 x 10^6 CFU per g soil in the tomato rhizosphere.

Interactor
B. velezensis CE 100Bacillus velezensise0other
Outcome
populations of B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100e0
Direction
Highere0
Value
6.52 × 106 CFU g−1of soile0
Setting
tomato rhizospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher populations of B. thuringiensis KYC and B. velezensis CE 100 (4.12 and 6.52 × 106 CFU g−1of soil) were detected in the tomato rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1492 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Bacillus velezensis · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

pathogen product · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.