Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Establishment Methods and Nutrient Management on Productivity of Kharif Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their Residual Effect on Succeeding Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop

H. L. Sonboir; Sanjay Sharma; R. Mahender Kumar; et al.

12
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agriculture Instructional cum Research Farm, IGKV Raipur during kharif and rabi seasons of three consecutive years of 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 with three rice establishment methods; six nutrient management in rice and two nutrient management in chickpea. Dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoon produced grain and straw yield similar to transplanting method, but higher net return and B: ratio. The seed yield of chickpea under dry direct seeded rice was 9.53 to 27.89% higher over transplanting method of rice. Combined application of 100% RDF and 5t/ha FYM in rice produced grain yield of rice, seed yield and net return of chickpea comparable to 150% RDF. In rice-chickpea cropping system, dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoon produced 4.85 to 14.72% higher rice equivalent yield and 22.64 to 27.93% net return compared to compared to transplanting method of rice. Combined application of 100% RDF and 5 t/ha FYM recorded higher rice equivalent yield and net return which was however, comparable to application of 150% RDF in net return. Application of 100%RDF in chickpea recorded an increase of 9.37 to 11.72% in seed yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry seeded rice had grain yield similar to transplanted rice.

Treatment
Dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoone0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
transplanting methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoon produced grain and straw yield similar to transplanting method, but higher net return and B: ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry seeded rice had straw yield similar to transplanted rice.

Treatment
Dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoone0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
transplanting methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoon produced grain and straw yield similar to transplanting method, but higher net return and B: ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry seeded rice had higher net return and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
Dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoone0
Outcome
net return and B: ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
transplanting methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoon produced grain and straw yield similar to transplanting method, but higher net return and B: ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea seed yield after dry seeded rice was 9.53 to 27.89% higher than after transplanted rice.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
dry direct seeded ricee0
Outcome
seed yield of chickpeae0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.53 to 27.89%e0
Comparator
transplanting method of ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed yield of chickpea under dry direct seeded rice was 9.53 to 27.89% higher over transplanting method of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield with RDF plus FYM was comparable to 150% RDF.

Treatment
100% RDF and 5t/ha FYMe0
Outcome
grain yield of ricee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
150% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 100% RDF and 5t/ha FYM in rice produced grain yield of rice, seed yield and net return of chickpea comparable to 150% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea seed yield with preceding rice RDF plus FYM was comparable to 150% RDF.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
100% RDF and 5t/ha FYM in ricee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
150% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 100% RDF and 5t/ha FYM in rice produced grain yield of rice, seed yield and net return of chickpea comparable to 150% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea net return with preceding rice RDF plus FYM was comparable to 150% RDF.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
100% RDF and 5t/ha FYM in ricee0
Outcome
net return of chickpeae0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
150% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 100% RDF and 5t/ha FYM in rice produced grain yield of rice, seed yield and net return of chickpea comparable to 150% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeded rice raised rice-equivalent yield by 4.85 to 14.72% versus transplanting.

Treatment
dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoone0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.85 to 14.72%e0
Comparator
transplanting method of ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoon produced 4.85 to 14.72% higher rice equivalent yield and 22.64 to 27.93% net return compared to compared to transplanting method of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeded rice raised net return by 22.64 to 27.93% versus transplanting.

Treatment
dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoone0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.64 to 27.93%e0
Comparator
transplanting method of ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry direct seeded rice before onset of monsoon produced 4.85 to 14.72% higher rice equivalent yield and 22.64 to 27.93% net return compared to compared to transplanting method of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus FYM produced higher rice-equivalent yield.

Treatment
100% RDF and 5 t/ha FYMe0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 100% RDF and 5 t/ha FYM recorded higher rice equivalent yield and net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus FYM produced higher net return, comparable to 150% RDF.

Treatment
100% RDF and 5 t/ha FYMe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
150% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 100% RDF and 5 t/ha FYM recorded higher rice equivalent yield and net return which was however, comparable to application of 150% RDF in net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 100% RDF to chickpea raised seed yield 9.37 to 11.72%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
100%RDFe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.37 to 11.72%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100%RDF in chickpea recorded an increase of 9.37 to 11.72% in seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1185 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.