Paper · 1992 · Experimental Agriculture

On-Farm Assessment of Improved Crop Production Practices in Northwest Syria. I. Chickpea

M. Pala; A. Mazid

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Thirty on-farm trials were conducted in northwest Syria over a period of four seasons to examine the main effects and interaction of sowing date, sowing method, Rhizobium inoculation, phosphate application and weed control on chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ). Advancing the sowing date from spring or late winter to early winter resulted in substantial yield increases. The effects of Rhizobium inoculation were small and inconsistent. Chemical weed control significantly increased grain yield compared with the unweeded control treatment in winter-sown crops but was less effective than hand weeding. Phosphate application significantly increased yield in the first three seasons, the overall increase being 10%. Drilling chickpea seed gave an overall 10% increase in yield compared with the broadcast sowing commonly practised by farmers. There is no economic or environmental risk to the farmer in adopting the proposed practices either singly or in combination. However, the greatest gains in yield and net revenue are derived from a combination of early winter sowing, drilling, weeding and, where appropriate, phosphate application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early winter sowing substantially increased chickpea yield relative to spring or late winter sowing.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
early wintere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
spring or late wintere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Advancing the sowing date from spring or late winter to early winter resulted in substantial yield increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation had small, inconsistent effects on chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of Rhizobium inoculation were small and inconsistent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weed control significantly increased grain yield against the unweeded control in winter-sown chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Chemical weed controle0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
winter-sown cropse0
Comparator
unweeded control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical weed control significantly increased grain yield compared with the unweeded control treatment in winter-sown crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weed control was less effective than hand weeding.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Chemical weed controle1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was less effective than hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chemical weed control significantly increased grain yield compared with the unweeded control treatment in winter-sown crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate application significantly increased chickpea yield by 10% overall in the first three seasons.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Phosphate applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
first three seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate application significantly increased yield in the first three seasons, the overall increase being 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drilling chickpea seed increased yield by 10% overall versus broadcast sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Drilling chickpea seede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
broadcast sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drilling chickpea seed gave an overall 10% increase in yield compared with the broadcast sowing commonly practised by farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–843 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed practices singly or combined posed no economic or environmental risk to farmers.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
no economic or environmental riske0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is no economic or environmental risk to the farmer in adopting the proposed practices either singly or in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined early winter sowing, drilling, weeding and appropriate phosphate gave the greatest yield gains.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combination of early winter sowing, drilling, weeding and, where appropriate, phosphate applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatest gainse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest gains in yield and net revenue are derived from a combination of early winter sowing, drilling, weeding and, where appropriate, phosphate application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combined practices gave the greatest net revenue gains.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combination of early winter sowing, drilling, weeding and, where appropriate, phosphate applicatione0
Outcome
net revenuee0
Direction
greatest gainse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greatest gains in yield and net revenue are derived from a combination of early winter sowing, drilling, weeding and, where appropriate, phosphate application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

sowing time · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 68 positive, 17 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    First-year seed yield did not differ with sowing date or nitrogen treatment.

    Development of yield and variability in yield components of chickpeas · 1994 · compared with either sowing date or nitrogen treatments

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 112 positive, 9 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.