Paper · 2020 · Plant Disease

Evaluating Cucurbit Rootstocks to Prevent Disease Caused by Pythium aphanidermatum and P. myriotylum on Watermelon

Sean M. Toporek; Anthony P. Keinath

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pythium species cause root and stem rot in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), but cucurbit rootstocks used to graft watermelon have not been evaluated for resistance. P. aphanidermatum and P. myriotylum were inoculated onto 15 nongrafted watermelon, citron (Citrullus amarus), bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), and interspecific hybrid squash (Cucurbita maxima × C. moschata) cultivars in a growth chamber. Watermelon was more susceptible than bottle gourd and interspecific hybrid squash at 20 and 30°C. Twenty-one cultivars were inoculated in a field with an equal blend of both Pythium species. Interspecific hybrid squash was less susceptible than bottle gourd and watermelon in 2018 and 2019. Seedless watermelon cultivar Tri-X 313 was grafted to one citron, one bottle gourd, and three interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks. Plants were inoculated in the field as described. Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks reduced disease incidence compared with nongrafted controls in 2018 and 2019. Mefenoxam and propamocarb applied at transplanting did not affect disease compared with non-fungicide-treated plots. Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash Camelforce significantly increased total and marketable fruit numbers and total weight in 2019 compared with the nongrafted control. In summary, interspecific hybrid squash was consistently resistant to Pythium, demonstrating resistance and utility in watermelon grafting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon was more susceptible to Pythium than bottle gourd at 20 and 30°C.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
more susceptiblee0
Qualifier
20 and 30°Ce0
Comparator
bottle gourde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was more susceptible than bottle gourd and interspecific hybrid squash at 20 and 30°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon was more susceptible to Pythium than interspecific hybrid squash at 20 and 30°C.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
more susceptiblee0
Qualifier
20 and 30°Ce0
Comparator
interspecific hybrid squashe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon was more susceptible than bottle gourd and interspecific hybrid squash at 20 and 30°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific hybrid squash was less susceptible than bottle gourd and watermelon in two years.

Taxon
Interspecific hybrid squashe0
Outcome
less susceptiblee0
Qualifier
2018 and 2019e0
Comparator
bottle gourd and watermelone0

Verbatim

e0

“Interspecific hybrid squash was less susceptible than bottle gourd and watermelon in 2018 and 2019.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks reduced watermelon disease incidence versus nongrafted controls.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash rootstockse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
2018 and 2019e0
Comparator
nongrafted controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks reduced disease incidence compared with nongrafted controls in 2018 and 2019.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mefenoxam at transplanting did not affect watermelon disease versus untreated plots.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Mefenoxame0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
non-fungicide-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mefenoxam and propamocarb applied at transplanting did not affect disease compared with non-fungicide-treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

propamocarb at transplanting did not affect watermelon disease versus untreated plots.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
propamocarbe0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
non-fungicide-treated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mefenoxam and propamocarb applied at transplanting did not affect disease compared with non-fungicide-treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Camelforce grafting increased total and marketable watermelon fruit numbers in 2019.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash Camelforcee0
Outcome
total and marketable fruit numberse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
2019e0
Comparator
nongrafted controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash Camelforce significantly increased total and marketable fruit numbers and total weight in 2019 compared with the nongrafted control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Camelforce grafting increased total watermelon fruit weight in 2019.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash Camelforcee0
Outcome
total weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
2019e0
Comparator
nongrafted controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting to interspecific hybrid squash Camelforce significantly increased total and marketable fruit numbers and total weight in 2019 compared with the nongrafted control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–114 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

grafting · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.