Paper · 2018 · Weed Science

Interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Density in Grafted and Nongrafted Watermelon

Matthew B. Bertucci; Katherine M. Jennings; David W. Monks; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai] grafting is commonly used for management of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens; however, little research exists describing the effect of grafting on the weed-competitive ability of watermelon. Field experiments determined the response in yield, fruit number, and fruit quality of grafted and nongrafted watermelon exposed to increasing densities of Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson). Grafting treatments included ‘Exclamation’ triploid (seedless) watermelon grafted on two interspecific hybrid squash rootstocks ‘Carnivor’ and ‘Kazako’, with nongrafted Exclamation as the control. Weed treatments included A. palmeri at densities of 1, 2, 3, and 4 A. palmeri plants per watermelon planting hole (0.76-m row) and a weed-free control. Increasing A. palmeri densities caused significant reductions (P <0.05) in marketable watermelon yield and marketable fruit number. Watermelon yield reduction was described by a rectangular hyperbola model, and 4 A. palmeri plants planting hole −1 reduced marketable yield 41%, 38%, and 65% for Exclamation, Carnivor, and Kazako, respectively. Neither grafting treatment nor A. palmeri density had a biologically meaningful effect on soluble solids content or on the incidence of hollow heart in watermelon fruit. Amaranthus palmeri seed and biomass production was similar across weed population densities, but seed number per female A. palmeri decreased according to a two-parameter exponential decay equation. Thus, increasing weed population densities resulted in increased intraspecific competition among A. palmeri plants. While grafting may offer benefits for disease resistance, no benefits regarding weed-competitive ability were observed, and a consistent yield penalty was associated with grafting, even in weed-free treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Palmer amaranth density significantly reduced marketable watermelon yield and fruit number.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
Increasing A. palmeri densitiese0
Interactor
Amaranthus palmeri S. WatsonAmaranthus palmerie2weed
Outcome
marketable watermelon yield and marketable fruit numbere0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing A. palmeri densities caused significant reductions (P <0.05) in marketable watermelon yield and marketable fruit number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–947 · show in text ↑
e1

“Watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑
e2

“Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At four Palmer amaranth plants per planting hole, Exclamation marketable yield fell 41%.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Exclamatione0
Treatment
4 A. palmeri plants planting hole −1e0
Interactor
A. palmeriAmaranthus palmerie0weed
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
41%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 A. palmeri plants planting hole −1 reduced marketable yield 41%, 38%, and 65% for Exclamation, Carnivor, and Kazako, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At four Palmer amaranth plants per planting hole, Carnivor marketable yield fell 38%.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Carnivore0
Treatment
4 A. palmeri plants planting hole −1e0
Interactor
A. palmeriAmaranthus palmerie0weed
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 A. palmeri plants planting hole −1 reduced marketable yield 41%, 38%, and 65% for Exclamation, Carnivor, and Kazako, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At four Palmer amaranth plants per planting hole, Kazako marketable yield fell 65%.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Material
Kazakoe0
Treatment
4 A. palmeri plants planting hole −1e0
Interactor
A. palmeriAmaranthus palmerie0weed
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 A. palmeri plants planting hole −1 reduced marketable yield 41%, 38%, and 65% for Exclamation, Carnivor, and Kazako, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting and Palmer amaranth density had no biologically meaningful effect on watermelon soluble solids or hollow heart.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
grafting treatment nor A. palmeri densitye0
Interactor
A. palmeriAmaranthus palmerie0weed
Outcome
soluble solids content or on the incidence of hollow hearte0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither grafting treatment nor A. palmeri density had a biologically meaningful effect on soluble solids content or on the incidence of hollow heart in watermelon fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1329 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palmer amaranth seed and biomass production was similar across weed densities.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Interactor
Amaranthus palmeriAmaranthus palmerie0weed
Outcome
Amaranthus palmeri seed and biomass productione0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus palmeri seed and biomass production was similar across weed population densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1421 · show in text ↑
e1

“watermelon fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed number per female Palmer amaranth decreased with weed density.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse2
Treatment
Increasing weed population densitiese1
Interactor
A. palmeriAmaranthus palmerie0weed
Outcome
seed number per female A. palmerie0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus palmeri
Amaranthus palmeri · InteractorPompilid · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed number per female A. palmeri decreased according to a two-parameter exponential decay equation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1527 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing weed population densities resulted in increased intraspecific competition among A. palmeri plants.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1534–1643 · show in text ↑
e2

“watermelon fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1328 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting showed no benefit for weed competitive ability and carried a yield penalty even without weeds.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
consistent yield penaltye0
Direction
penaltye0
Qualifier
even in weed-free treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no benefits regarding weed-competitive ability were observed, and a consistent yield penalty was associated with grafting, even in weed-free treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1854 · show in text ↑
e1

“Watermelon [ Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑

grafting · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.