Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Azotobacter, Phosphate Solubilising Bacteria and Potash Mobilising Bacteria Inoculants on Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

B. C. Game; B. M. Ilhe; V. S. Pawar; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Experiment was carried out to study the effect of biofertilizers viz., Azotobacter, phosphate solubilizing bacteria and potash mobilizing bacteria, alone and in combinations along with different doses of inorganic fertilizers on yield of wheat. Highest number of tillers per hill (10.8), plant height (98.71 cm) and thousand grain weight (43.09 g) was recorded in seed treatment with MPKV Consortium + 100% RDF. Highest grain yield (44.22 q/ha) was also recorded in same treatment of MPKV Consortium + 100% RDF which was at par with treatment with 100% RDF (42.20 q/ha) while, the lowest wheat grain yield was recorded in absolute control treatment (28.16 q/ha). Seed treatment with MPKV consortium increased 2.64 q/ha yield over control plot. Seed treatment with MPKV consortium along with recommended dose of fertilizer was found to be the best treatment in enhancing yield of wheat crop and increased 2.02 q/ha yield over the treatment in which only recommended dose of fertilizers was used. Soil nutrient status after crop harvest was found superior in the same treatment. Microbial activity in rhizosphere remained at elevated level in the treatment where biofertilizers inoculants were used but inorganic fertilizers were not added. The increment of yield and its components due to the biofertilizer inoculation may be attributed to the increase in nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, potash mobilization and the production of plant growth promoting substances that enhance soil microbial activity that contributes towards the nutrient availability to plants. The application of biofertilizer increased the efficiency of both organic and inorganic fertilizers but alone was ineffective in increasing yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPKV Consortium plus full fertilizer produced the highest tiller number, 10.8 per hill.

Treatment
seed treatment with MPKV Consortium + 100% RDFe0
Outcome
number of tillers per hille0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
10.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest number of tillers per hill (10.8), plant height (98.71 cm) and thousand grain weight (43.09 g) was recorded in seed treatment with MPKV Consortium + 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the highest plant height of 98.71 cm.

Treatment
seed treatment with MPKV Consortium + 100% RDFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
98.71 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest number of tillers per hill (10.8), plant height (98.71 cm) and thousand grain weight (43.09 g) was recorded in seed treatment with MPKV Consortium + 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment produced the highest thousand grain weight of 43.09 g.

Treatment
seed treatment with MPKV Consortium + 100% RDFe0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
43.09 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest number of tillers per hill (10.8), plant height (98.71 cm) and thousand grain weight (43.09 g) was recorded in seed treatment with MPKV Consortium + 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium plus full fertilizer gave the highest grain yield, 44.22 q/ha, statistically at par with full fertilizer alone.

Treatment
MPKV Consortium + 100% RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
44.22 q/hae0
Qualifier
42.20 q/hae0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest grain yield (44.22 q/ha) was also recorded in same treatment of MPKV Consortium + 100% RDF which was at par with treatment with 100% RDF (42.20 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absolute control had the lowest wheat grain yield, 28.16 q/ha.

Treatment
absolute control treatmente0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
28.16 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest wheat grain yield was recorded in absolute control treatment (28.16 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPKV consortium seed treatment increased yield by 2.64 q/ha over control.

Treatment
Seed treatment with MPKV consortiume0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.64 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treatment with MPKV consortium increased 2.64 q/ha yield over control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium plus recommended fertilizer increased yield by 2.02 q/ha relative to recommended fertilizer alone.

Treatment
Seed treatment with MPKV consortium along with recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.02 q/hae0
Comparator
only recommended dose of fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treatment with MPKV consortium along with recommended dose of fertilizer was found to be the best treatment in enhancing yield of wheat crop and increased 2.02 q/ha yield over the treatment in which only recommended dose of fertilizers was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest soil nutrient status was superior under consortium plus recommended fertilizer.

Treatment
same treatmente0
Outcome
Soil nutrient status after crop harveste0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil nutrient status after crop harvest was found superior in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere microbial activity remained elevated with biofertilizer inoculants but no inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
biofertilizers inoculants were used but inorganic fertilizers were not addede0
Outcome
Microbial activity in rhizospheree0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“Microbial activity in rhizosphere remained at elevated level in the treatment where biofertilizers inoculants were used but inorganic fertilizers were not added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer application increased the efficiency of organic and inorganic fertilizers.

Treatment
application of biofertilizere0
Outcome
efficiency of both organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of biofertilizer increased the efficiency of both organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer alone was ineffective in increasing yield.

Treatment
alonee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
ineffective in increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–144 · show in text ↑
e0

“but alone was ineffective in increasing yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1720 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

82 papers: 77 positive, 5 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.