Abstract
In recent years, the use of saline water in agriculture has become an alternative mainly because of water scarcity. However, plants do not tolerate high salt contents; so, the use of salt stress attenuators could enable saline water usage in agriculture. This study aimed to assess the effect of saline water and silicon applications on growth, chloroplastid pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence a and beet production. The experiment was conducted with complete randomized blocks in a 5 x 5 combined factorial arrangement according to the Central Composite of Box experiment matrix for the electrical conductivity in the irrigation water (ECw) and silicon doses (Si), with minimum (- α) and maximum (α) values from 0.5 to 6.0 dS m-1 and from 0.00 to 18.16 mL L-1, totaling nine treatments, with four replicates and three plants per plot. The irrigation water ECw increase reduced growth and beet production, but the chlorophyll contents, biomass and fluorescence production were not affected by salinity. Silicon applications via the soil increased growth and chlorophyll fluorescence a but did not reduce the harmful effect of the salt stress. The irrigation water ECw above 0.50 dS m-1 negatively affected the beet crop. The silicon dose of 9.08 mL L-1 is the most recommended application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation water conductivity reduced beet growth.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- irrigation water ECw increasee0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“irrigation water ECw increase reduced growth and beet production”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher irrigation water conductivity reduced beet production.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- irrigation water ECw increasee0
- Outcome
- beet productione0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“irrigation water ECw increase reduced growth and beet production”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect chlorophyll contents.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- salinitye0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contentse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“chlorophyll contents, biomass and fluorescence production were not affected by salinity”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect biomass.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- salinitye0
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“chlorophyll contents, biomass and fluorescence production were not affected by salinity”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect fluorescence production.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- salinitye0
- Outcome
- fluorescence productione0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“chlorophyll contents, biomass and fluorescence production were not affected by salinity”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil silicon application increased beet growth.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Silicon applications via the soile0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Silicon applications via the soil increased growth and chlorophyll fluorescence a”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil silicon application increased chlorophyll fluorescence a.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Silicon applications via the soile0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll fluorescence ae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Silicon applications via the soil increased growth and chlorophyll fluorescence a”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Silicon did not reduce salt stress harm.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Silicone1
- Outcome
- harmful effect of the salt stresse0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“did not reduce the harmful effect of the salt stress”
e1“Silicon applications via the soil”
t0“beet production”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water ECw above 0.50 dS m-1 harmed beet crop.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarise0 - Treatment
- irrigation water ECw above 0.50 dS m-1e0
- Outcome
- beet crope0
- Direction
- negatively affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“irrigation water ECw above 0.50 dS m-1 negatively affected the beet crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend silicon at 9.08 mL L-1.
- Taxon
- beet
Beta vulgarist0 - Outcome
- silicon dose of 9.08 mL L-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“silicon dose of 9.08 mL L-1 is the most recommended application”
t0“beet production”
The same questions in other papers
silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
silicon atom · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →salinity · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →salinity · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →irrigation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
109 papers more in this group
See all 113 papers →irrigation · organism · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
salinity · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →irrigation · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.