Paper · 2020 · Plant Health Progress

Determining the Profitability of Reniform Nematode Control Practices in the Mississippi Cotton Production System

Bradley R. Wilson; Thomas W. Allen; Angus L. Catchot; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, can be damaging in silt loam soils that have predominantly supported cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in the Mid-Southern United States. The objective of this research was to determine the profitability of integrated nematode management options in Mississippi cotton production in soils naturally infested with the reniform nematode. Experiments were conducted near Hamilton, MS, in 2016 and Oswego and Tchula, MS, in 2017. Commercially available seed treatments included a base seed treatment of azoxystrobin + fludioxonil + mefenoxam and seed-applied nematicides including thiodicarb + imidacloprid and fluopyram. In-furrow nematicides included aldicarb and fluopyram + imidacloprid. Lastly, 1,3-dichloropropene was applied preplant to soil followed by cotton seed with and without treatment. Cotton yield was 40 kg/ha greater when 1,3-dichloropropene was applied, and a base fungicide seed treatment was utilized compared with the base seed treatment alone. Cotton yield was at least 73 kg/ha greater when the base seed treatment was followed by aldicarb or fluopyram + imidacloprid in-furrow compared with seed treatments alone. Economic analyses suggested that seed treatment and in-furrow nematicides without 1,3-dichloropropene provided the greatest return on investment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant 1,3-dichloropropene plus a base fungicide seed treatment increased cotton yield by 40 kg/ha versus the base treatment alone.

Treatment
1,3-dichloropropene was applied, and a base fungicide seed treatment was utilizede0
Interactor
Rotylenchulus reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise1pathogen
Outcome
Cotton yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
40 kg/hae0
Comparator
base seed treatment alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield was 40 kg/ha greater when 1,3-dichloropropene was applied, and a base fungicide seed treatment was utilized compared with the base seed treatment alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, can be damaging in silt loam soils that have predominantly supported cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in the Mid-Southern United States.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Base seed treatment followed by in-furrow aldicarb increased cotton yield by at least 73 kg/ha versus seed treatments alone.

Treatment
base seed treatment was followed by aldicarbe0
Interactor
Rotylenchulus reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise1pathogen
Outcome
Cotton yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
at least 73 kg/hae0
Comparator
seed treatments alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield was at least 73 kg/ha greater when the base seed treatment was followed by aldicarb or fluopyram + imidacloprid in-furrow compared with seed treatments alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, can be damaging in silt loam soils that have predominantly supported cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in the Mid-Southern United States.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Base seed treatment followed by in-furrow fluopyram plus imidacloprid increased cotton yield by at least 73 kg/ha versus seed treatments alone.

Treatment
fluopyram + imidacloprid in-furrowe0
Interactor
Rotylenchulus reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise1pathogen
Outcome
Cotton yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
at least 73 kg/hae0
Comparator
seed treatments alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield was at least 73 kg/ha greater when the base seed treatment was followed by aldicarb or fluopyram + imidacloprid in-furrow compared with seed treatments alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis, can be damaging in silt loam soils that have predominantly supported cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in the Mid-Southern United States.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–194 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment and in-furrow nematicides without 1,3-dichloropropene had the greatest return on investment.

Treatment
seed treatment and in-furrow nematicides without 1,3-dichloropropenee0
Outcome
return on investmente0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Economic analyses suggested that seed treatment and in-furrow nematicides without 1,3-dichloropropene provided the greatest return on investment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Production System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–112 · show in text ↑

fluopyram · Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

aldicarb · Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.