Paper · 2019 · Civil War Book Review

COMPARISON OF SEED TREATMENT NEMATICIDES (AERIS AND AERIS + VOTIVO) AND TEMIK 15G ON THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM GROWING IN SOILS INFESTED WITH ROTYLENCHULUS RENIFORMIS UNDER GREENHOUSE ENVIRONMENTS

H R Smith; R. L. Harkness; P.R. Knight; et al.

6
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis) currently infests 36% of Mississippi cotton acreage causing economic losses of $130 million annually. With Temik 15G being removed from the market, there is a need to better understand nematode management programs centered on Nematicide Seed Treatments (NST). Economic threshholds for R. reniformis in Mississippi on medium-textured soils range from 1,000 to 5,000 R. reniformis/500 cm3 of soil depending on season. This study aimed to determine effects of R. reniformis and efficacy of NST compared to Temik 15G on cotton growth. In greenhouse studies, all plants treated with NST had greater root and shoot biomasses compared to the untreated control within nematode populations. For treatments inoculated with a range of R. reniformis/500 cm3 soil (Pi), greatest shoot biomass occurred in plants treated with Temik 15G at 2,500 Pi, and greatest root mass occurred in plants treated with Temik 15G whether Pi was 2,500, 5,000, or 7,500. Plants treated with Aeris® alone provided suitable root and shoot growth at 2,500 Pi, but became less effective at 5,000 Pi. Plants treated with Aeris® + Votivo® at 2,500 Pi produced greater root and shoot biomass compared to plants grown in soils with 5,000 or 7,500 Pi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed nematicide treatments increased cotton root and shoot biomass versus untreated plants in nematode populations.

Treatment
NSTe0
Interactor
Rotylenchulus reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise2pest
Outcome
root and shoot biomassese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all plants treated with NST had greater root and shoot biomasses compared to the untreated control within nematode populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–725 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“Reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temik 15G yielded greatest shoot biomass at 2,500 Pi.

Treatment
Temik 15Ge0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise2pest
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
2,500 Pie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatest shoot biomass occurred in plants treated with Temik 15G at 2,500 Pi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. reniformis/500 cm3 soil (Pi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temik 15G yielded greatest root mass at 2,500, 5,000 and 7,500 Pi.

Treatment
Temik 15Ge0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise2pest
Outcome
root masse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
Pi was 2,500, 5,000, or 7,500e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatest root mass occurred in plants treated with Temik 15G whether Pi was 2,500, 5,000, or 7,500”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. reniformis/500 cm3 soil (Pi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeris alone provided suitable root and shoot growth at 2,500 Pi.

Treatment
Aeris®e0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise2pest
Outcome
root and shoot growthe0
Qualifier
2,500 Pie0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with Aeris® alone provided suitable root and shoot growth at 2,500 Pi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. reniformis/500 cm3 soil (Pi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeris alone became less effective at 5,000 Pi.

Treatment
Aeris®e1
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise3pest
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Qualifier
5,000 Pie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“became less effective at 5,000 Pi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants treated with Aeris® alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–574 · show in text ↑
e3

“R. reniformis/500 cm3 soil (Pi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aeris plus Votivo at 2,500 Pi gave greater root and shoot biomass than at 5,000 or 7,500 Pi.

Treatment
Aeris® + Votivo®e0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise2pest
Outcome
root and shoot biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
2,500 Pie0
Comparator
plants grown in soils with 5,000 or 7,500 Pie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with Aeris® + Votivo® at 2,500 Pi produced greater root and shoot biomass compared to plants grown in soils with 5,000 or 7,500 Pi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1254 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“R. reniformis/500 cm3 soil (Pi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–800 · show in text ↑

insecticide · Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

seed treatment · Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.