Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Agronomic efficiency of organomineral fertilizer in sequential grain crops in southern Brazil

Gilmar L. Mumbach; Luciano C. Gatiboni; Fabiano D. de Bona; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
43
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract The use of organomineral fertilizers in agriculture instead of mineral fertilizers is a way to add organic compounds to the soil, potentially improving its properties and crop production. Our objective was to evaluate the agronomic efficiency of an organomineral fertilizer manufactured from poultry litter and mineral fertilizers. The experiment was carried out in a Humic Cambisol in the subtropical region of Brazil, with high organic matter content, low phosphorus content, and very high potassium content. The study consisted of six treatments: mineral fertilizer (monoammonium phosphate, KCl, and urea), at rates of 100 and 150% of the technical recommendation; organic fertilizer (poultry litter), at 100% rate; organomineral fertilizer (poultry litter + monoammonium phosphate), at rates of 100 and 150%; and control treatment (without fertilization). Between 2015 and 2017, common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and corn ( Zea mays L.) were sequentially cultivated. Before performing the experiment and at the end of the fourth crop, chemical properties of the soil were analyzed in the 0‐ to 10‐ and 10‐ to 20‐cm layers. The use of fertilizers increased crop yield, but there was no difference between the three fertilizer sources or between the 100 and 150% rates of the technical recommendation. Chemical properties of the soil were altered in a similar manner with fertilization, regardless of the fertilizer source used. According to the results, the organomineral fertilizer can replace mineral fertilizers with equivalent performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers increased common bean crop yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of fertilizers increased crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and corn ( Zea mays L.) were sequentially cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers increased wheat crop yield.

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of fertilizers increased crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and corn ( Zea mays L.) were sequentially cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers increased corn crop yield.

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of fertilizers increased crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and corn ( Zea mays L.) were sequentially cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common bean yield did not differ among fertilizer sources or between recommendation rates.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
three fertilizer sourcese0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
100 and 150% rates of the technical recommendatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of fertilizers increased crop yield, but there was no difference between the three fertilizer sources or between the 100 and 150% rates of the technical recommendation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and corn ( Zea mays L.) were sequentially cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield did not differ among fertilizer sources or between recommendation rates.

Treatment
three fertilizer sourcese0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
100 and 150% rates of the technical recommendatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of fertilizers increased crop yield, but there was no difference between the three fertilizer sources or between the 100 and 150% rates of the technical recommendation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and corn ( Zea mays L.) were sequentially cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield did not differ among fertilizer sources or between recommendation rates.

Treatment
three fertilizer sourcese0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
100 and 150% rates of the technical recommendatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of fertilizers increased crop yield, but there was no difference between the three fertilizer sources or between the 100 and 150% rates of the technical recommendation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and corn ( Zea mays L.) were sequentially cultivated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization altered soil chemical properties similarly regardless of source.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
Chemical properties of the soile0
Comparator
fertilizer sourcee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical properties of the soil were altered in a similar manner with fertilization, regardless of the fertilizer source used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1472 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that organomineral fertilizer can replace mineral fertilizers with equivalent performance.

Outcome
organomineral fertilizer can replace mineral fertilizerse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the organomineral fertilizer can replace mineral fertilizers with equivalent performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1587 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.