Paper · 2019 · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias - Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Organic, mineral and organomineral fertilizer in the growth of wheat and chemical changes of the soil

G.L. Mumbach; L.C. Gatiboni; F.D. Bona; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The organomineral fertilizers can release organic compounds during their solubilization, and those compounds can affect the plant growth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the initial development of wheat, nutrient accumulation in the plant and soil chemical changes, with the use of organic, mineral and organomineral fertilizers. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse using an Acrisol cultivated with wheat (Triticum aestivum). Six treatments were tested: 100% of the nutrient recommendation in organomineral form (OMF 100); broiler litter in the same amount present in the OMF 100 (BL 10); mineral fertilizer in the same quantity present in the OMF 100 (MF 90); 100% of the nutrient recommendation in the form of broiler litter (BL 100); 100% of the nutrient recommendation in mineral form (MF 100); and a control without fertilization (CONT). The treatments were evaluated at six sampling times: 2, 4, 8, 15, 30 and 80 days after implantation. No significant differences were observed between fertilizers in dry matter yield. In the soil, there was a decrease in availability of N, P and K over time. By equivalence, all the sources tested can be used in the supply of nutrients to the wheat crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer sources did not differ significantly in wheat dry matter yield.

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
between fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were observed between fertilizers in dry matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the sources tested can be used in the supply of nutrients to the wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1211 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the soil, there was a decrease in availability of N, P and K over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen availability decreased over time.

Outcome
availability of Ne0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
over timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the soil, there was a decrease in availability of N, P and K over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the sources tested can be used in the supply of nutrients to the wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil phosphorus availability decreased over time.

Outcome
availability of N, P and Ke0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
over timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the soil, there was a decrease in availability of N, P and K over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the sources tested can be used in the supply of nutrients to the wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil potassium availability decreased over time.

Outcome
availability of N, P and Ke0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
over timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the soil, there was a decrease in availability of N, P and K over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the sources tested can be used in the supply of nutrients to the wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1211 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude all tested fertilizer sources can supply nutrients to wheat.

Outcome
all the sources tested can be used in the supply of nutrients to the wheat crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the sources tested can be used in the supply of nutrients to the wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1211 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the soil, there was a decrease in availability of N, P and K over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1114 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.