Abstract
ABSTRACT The little-known use of okra grafting, mainly to incorporate nematode resistance, requires evaluation of interspecific compatibilities. This study aimed to determine the compatibility of the okra ‘Santa Cruz 47’ cultivar grafted onto different rootstocks of the Malvaceae family. The research was divided into two experimental stages, with the treatments consisting of non-grafted, self-grafted or grafted okra plants onto rootstocks of mallow, roselle and pima cotton. In the first stage, a completely randomized design was used, with four replications and seedlings grown in a humidity chamber. In the second stage, the seedlings were transplanted to a greenhouse and a randomized block design was used, with five replications. The results of the first stage demonstrated that the self-grafting provided the best results for the growth characteristics assessed, except for the diameter of the grafted region. There was no difference among the treatments for the graft survival rate. In the second stage, the use of roselle as a rootstock enabled an adequate vegetative development, but did not differ from the treatments of self-grafting and mallow rootstock for the graft survival rate. The treatments did not differ for fruit diameter, length and average mass. Grafts onto roselle were the most precocious ones, with estimated means for production per plant (478.75 g), commercial yield (10.07 t ha-1) and total yield (10.64 t ha-1) similar to those observed for self-grafted and non-grafted plants. Hence, among the assessed rootstocks, roselle was identified as the most promising one for grafting with okra.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Self-grafting gave the best seedling growth characteristics except graft-region diameter.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- ‘Santa Cruz 47’t0
- Treatment
- self-graftinge0
- Outcome
- growth characteristicse0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- except for the diameter of the grafted regione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the self-grafting provided the best results for the growth characteristics assessed, except for the diameter of the grafted region.”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Graft survival rate did not differ among first-stage treatments.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- graft survival ratee0
- Direction
- no differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no difference among the treatments for the graft survival rate.”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Roselle rootstock enabled adequate vegetative development.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- roselle as a rootstocke0
- Outcome
- adequate vegetative developmente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of roselle as a rootstock enabled an adequate vegetative development”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Roselle graft survival was similar to self-grafted and mallow-rootstock plants.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- roselle as a rootstocke1
- Outcome
- graft survival ratee0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Comparator
- self-grafting and mallow rootstocke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“did not differ from the treatments of self-grafting and mallow rootstock for the graft survival rate.”
e1“roselle as a rootstock”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments did not differ for fruit diameter, length, or average mass.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fruit diameter, length and average masse0
- Direction
- did not differe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatments did not differ for fruit diameter, length and average mass.”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Roselle grafts were the earliest to produce.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Grafts onto rosellee0
- Outcome
- most precociouse0
- Direction
- most precociouse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grafts onto roselle were the most precocious ones”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Roselle grafts produced an estimated 478.75 g per plant, similar to self- and non-grafted plants.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Grafts onto rosellee1
- Outcome
- production per plante0
- Direction
- similare0
- Value
- 478.75 ge0
- Comparator
- self-grafted and non-grafted plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“production per plant (478.75 g), commercial yield (10.07 t ha-1) and total yield (10.64 t ha-1) similar to those observed for self-grafted and non-grafted plants.”
e1“Grafts onto roselle”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Roselle grafts had estimated commercial yield of 10.07 t ha-1, similar to comparison grafts.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Grafts onto rosellee1
- Outcome
- commercial yielde0
- Direction
- similare0
- Value
- 10.07 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- self-grafted and non-grafted plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“commercial yield (10.07 t ha-1) and total yield (10.64 t ha-1) similar to those observed for self-grafted and non-grafted plants.”
e1“Grafts onto roselle”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Roselle grafts had estimated total yield of 10.64 t ha-1, similar to comparison grafts.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Grafts onto rosellee1
- Outcome
- total yielde0
- Direction
- similare0
- Value
- 10.64 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- self-grafted and non-grafted plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total yield (10.64 t ha-1) similar to those observed for self-grafted and non-grafted plants.”
e1“Grafts onto roselle”
t0“‘Santa Cruz 47’ okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Roselle was identified as the most promising rootstock for okra grafting.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Outcome
- roselle was identified as the most promising one for grafting with okrae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“roselle was identified as the most promising one for grafting with okra.”
The same questions in other papers
Hibiscus sabdariffa · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Hibiscus sabdariffa · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
grafting · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.