Paper · 2016 · Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh Science

Effects of NAA and different nitrogen levels on nutrient uptake by BARI Gom-26 (Triticum aestivum L.)

Saiful Islam; Nargis Jahan

15
claims
34
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of NAA (0, 25, 50 ppm) at varying nitrogen levels (0, 50, 75, 100 % of the recommended dose) on nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) uptake by shoot and root and percentage of total NPK uptake by BARI Gom-26 at flowering and grain filling stage. Application of NAA at varying nitrogen levels had significant effect on P and K uptake by shoot and root at both stages, whereas, the N content of shoot at flowering stage and of root at the grain filling stage were non-significant.At both the stages, K content of root increased following all the treatments. At flowering and grain filling stage, P content of root and shoot increased and decreased due to different treatments. The maximum percentage of total NPK uptake was recorded from K followed by N and P respectively at both stages. In majority cases there was a decreasing trend in percentage uptake of N and P at grain filling stage compared with flowering stagewhereas, the trend was almost reverse in case of K. The N content of grain increased following all the treatments, the maximum being due to 25 ppm NAA in combination with 75 % N-fertilizer. Only decrease in P content of grain was recorded when 25 ppm NAA without any N-fertilizer was applied. In case of K content, 50 ppm NAA without any N-fertilizer resulted the only decrease. The highest nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by total plant was also recorded from 50 ppm NAA in combination with 50 % N-fertilizer at flowering stage, whereas, from 25 ppm NAA in combination with 75 % N-fertilizer at grain filling stage.J. Asiat. Soc. Bangladesh, Sci. 42(1): 69-76, June 2016

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA and nitrogen levels significantly affected P and K uptake by shoots and roots at both stages.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NAA at varying nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
P and K uptake by shoot and roote0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NAA at varying nitrogen levels had significant effect on P and K uptake by shoot and root at both stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot N at flowering and root N at grain filling did not show significant treatment differences.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
NAA at varying nitrogen levelse1
Outcome
N content of shoot at flowering stage and of root at the grain filling stagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N content of shoot at flowering stage and of root at the grain filling stage were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of NAA at varying nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root K content increased under all treatments at both stages.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
K content of roote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At both the stages, K content of root increased following all the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot P content increased under some treatments at flowering and grain filling.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
P content of root and shoote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At flowering and grain filling stage, P content of root and shoot increased and decreased due to different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot P content decreased under some treatments at flowering and grain filling.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
P content of root and shoote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At flowering and grain filling stage, P content of root and shoot increased and decreased due to different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K had the maximum percentage of total NPK uptake, followed by N and P at both stages.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
percentage of total NPK uptakee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum percentage of total NPK uptake was recorded from K followed by N and P respectively at both stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage N uptake generally declined at grain filling versus flowering.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Outcome
percentage uptake of Ne0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
flowering stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In majority cases there was a decreasing trend in percentage uptake of N and P at grain filling stage compared with flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage P uptake generally declined at grain filling versus flowering.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Outcome
percentage uptake of N and Pe0
Direction
decreasinge0
Comparator
flowering stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In majority cases there was a decreasing trend in percentage uptake of N and P at grain filling stage compared with flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage K uptake generally rose at grain filling versus flowering.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
flowering stagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the trend was almost reverse in case of K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreasing trend in percentage uptake of N and P at grain filling stage compared with flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased grain N content.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
N content of graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N content of grain increased following all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 ppm NAA with 75 % N-fertilizer produced the maximum grain N content.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
25 ppm NAA in combination with 75 % N-fertilizere0
Outcome
N content of graine1
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum being due to 25 ppm NAA in combination with 75 % N-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“The N content of grain increased following all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 ppm NAA without N fertilizer caused the only decrease in grain P content.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
25 ppm NAA without any N-fertilizere0
Outcome
P content of graine0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only decrease in P content of grain was recorded when 25 ppm NAA without any N-fertilizer was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 ppm NAA without N fertilizer caused the only decrease in grain K content.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
50 ppm NAA without any N-fertilizere0
Outcome
K contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of K content, 50 ppm NAA without any N-fertilizer resulted the only decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 ppm NAA with 50 % N fertilizer gave the highest total-plant NUE at flowering.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
50 ppm NAA in combination with 50 % N-fertilizere0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by total plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by total plant was also recorded from 50 ppm NAA in combination with 50 % N-fertilizer at flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25 ppm NAA with 75 % N fertilizer gave the highest total-plant NUE at grain filling.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Treatment
25 ppm NAA in combination with 75 % N-fertilizere0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by total plante1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 25 ppm NAA in combination with 75 % N-fertilizer at grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1593 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by total plant was also recorded from 50 ppm NAA in combination with 50 % N-fertilizer at flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–100 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.