Paper · 2020 · Revista Caatinga

PERIODICITY OF EXPOSURE OF HYDROPONIC LETTUCE PLANTS TO NUTRIENT SOLUTION1

CLEITON DALASTRA; MARCELO CARVALHO MINHOTO TEIXEIRA FILHO; PABLO FORLAN VARGAS

3
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT A balanced periodicity of the nutrient solution flow is essential for better agronomic performances and low production costs in hydroponic systems. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of periodicity of exposure of lettuce plants to the nutrient solution in an NFT hydroponic system on the production, nutrition, and profitability of this crop. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with five replications. The treatments consisted of four periodicities of exposure of lettuce plants to the nutrient solution, consisting of intervals of 60, 30, and 15 minutes between pumping periods of 15 minutes; and uninterrupted flow of the nutrient solution. The plants were harvested at 30 days after transplanting, and 15 lettuce plants of each experimental plot were used to determine total fresh weight; root fresh weight; shoot freshweight; and contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, B, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn in shoots, roots, and in the diagnostic leaf; accumulation of these nutrients in shoots and roots; and nitrate and ammonium contents in plant shoot. The highest production and profitability of lettuce were found using uninterrupted nutrient solution flow, which provided higher shoot and root nutrient contents to plants, and resulted in a better nutrient use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninterrupted nutrient solution flow gave the highest lettuce production and profitability.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
uninterrupted nutrient solution flowe1
Outcome
production and profitabilitye1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
intervals of 60, 30, and 15 minutes between pumping periods of 15 minutese4
Setting
NFT hydroponic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PERIODICITY OF EXPOSURE OF HYDROPONIC LETTUCE PLANTS TO NUTRIENT SOLUTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“in an NFT hydroponic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest production and profitability of lettuce were found using uninterrupted nutrient solution flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1199 · show in text ↑
e4

“consisting of intervals of 60, 30, and 15 minutes between pumping periods of 15 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninterrupted nutrient solution flow gave higher shoot and root nutrient contents in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
uninterrupted nutrient solution flowe1
Outcome
shoot and root nutrient contentse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
intervals of 60, 30, and 15 minutes between pumping periods of 15 minutese4
Setting
NFT hydroponic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PERIODICITY OF EXPOSURE OF HYDROPONIC LETTUCE PLANTS TO NUTRIENT SOLUTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“in an NFT hydroponic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest production and profitability of lettuce were found using uninterrupted nutrient solution flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1199 · show in text ↑
e2

“which provided higher shoot and root nutrient contents to plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1265 · show in text ↑
e4

“consisting of intervals of 60, 30, and 15 minutes between pumping periods of 15 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninterrupted nutrient solution flow resulted in better nutrient use efficiency in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
uninterrupted nutrient solution flowe1
Outcome
nutrient use efficiencye3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
intervals of 60, 30, and 15 minutes between pumping periods of 15 minutese4
Setting
NFT hydroponic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PERIODICITY OF EXPOSURE OF HYDROPONIC LETTUCE PLANTS TO NUTRIENT SOLUTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“in an NFT hydroponic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest production and profitability of lettuce were found using uninterrupted nutrient solution flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1199 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulted in a better nutrient use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1315 · show in text ↑
e4

“consisting of intervals of 60, 30, and 15 minutes between pumping periods of 15 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–649 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

137 papers: 112 positive, 25 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

212 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

245 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.