Paper · 2020 · Ciência e Agrotecnologia

Rootstocks for the new seedless table grape ‘BRS Vitória’ under tropical semi-arid conditions of São Francisco Valley

Patrícia Coelho de Souza Leão; José Henrique Bernardino do Nascimento; Dayane Silva de Moraes; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT ‘BRS Vitoria’ is the most important Brazilian table grape cultivar in the domestic and foreign markets, standing out for the seedleness, pleasant flavor, high yield and mildew resistance. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the rootstock on the yield, production components, vigor, and physical and chemical characteristics of the ‘BRS Vitória’ grape under irrigation in the Brazilian semi-arid region. The experiment was conducted over eight consecutive production cycles in the period from 2015 to 2018 in a commercial area in the Senador Nilo Coelho project, Petrolina, PE. The treatments were represented by seven rootstocks: ‘IAC 572’, ‘IAC 766’, ‘IAC 313’, ‘Harmony’, ‘SO4’, ‘Paulsen 1103’, and ‘Freedom’, using a randomized block experimental design with four replications. The results were variable among production cycles, with significant effects of the rootstock in some cycles and/or in the overall mean of the cycles. The variables of pruning weight, sprouting, bud fertility, and titratable acidity were not affected by the rootstock in any of the production cycles evaluated in this study. ‘Harmony’ rootstock promoted greater berry mass and diameter but reduced the soluble solids content. Vines of ‘BRS Vitória’ showed moderate vigor, high bud fertility and yield, satisfactory characteristics of bunch and berry, sugars and acids content that meet the requirements of the most demanding markets in all the rootstocks evaluated in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock effects varied across production cycles, with significant effects in some cycles or overall means.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocke0
Outcome
resultse0
Qualifier
in some cycles and/or in the overall mean of the cyclese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The results were variable among production cycles, with significant effects of the rootstock in some cycles and/or in the overall mean of the cycles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning weight, sprouting and bud fertility were unaffected by rootstock in all evaluated cycles.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocke0
Outcome
pruning weight, sprouting, bud fertilitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The variables of pruning weight, sprouting, bud fertility, and titratable acidity were not affected by the rootstock in any of the production cycles evaluated in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity was unaffected by rootstock in all evaluated cycles.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocke0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“titratable acidity were not affected by the rootstock in any of the production cycles evaluated in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony rootstock increased berry mass and diameter.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
‘Harmony’ rootstocke0
Outcome
berry mass and diametere0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“‘Harmony’ rootstock promoted greater berry mass and diameter but reduced the soluble solids content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony rootstock reduced soluble solids content.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
‘Harmony’ rootstocke0
Outcome
soluble solids contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“‘Harmony’ rootstock promoted greater berry mass and diameter but reduced the soluble solids content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Vitória vines showed moderate vigor, high bud fertility and high yield on all evaluated rootstocks.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
‘BRS Vitória’e0
Outcome
moderate vigor, high bud fertility and yielde0
Qualifier
in all the rootstocks evaluated in this studye0

Verbatim

e0

“Vines of ‘BRS Vitória’ showed moderate vigor, high bud fertility and yield, satisfactory characteristics of bunch and berry, sugars and acids content that meet the requirements of the most demanding markets in all the rootstocks evaluated in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Vitória bunch and berry characteristics were satisfactory across evaluated rootstocks.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
‘BRS Vitória’e0
Outcome
satisfactory characteristics of bunch and berrye0

Verbatim

e0

“Vines of ‘BRS Vitória’ showed moderate vigor, high bud fertility and yield, satisfactory characteristics of bunch and berry, sugars and acids content that meet the requirements of the most demanding markets in all the rootstocks evaluated in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Vitória sugar and acid contents met demanding market requirements on all evaluated rootstocks.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
‘BRS Vitória’e0
Outcome
sugars and acids contente0
Qualifier
meet the requirements of the most demanding marketse0

Verbatim

e0

“Vines of ‘BRS Vitória’ showed moderate vigor, high bud fertility and yield, satisfactory characteristics of bunch and berry, sugars and acids content that meet the requirements of the most demanding markets in all the rootstocks evaluated in this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

grafting · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

grafting · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

31 papers: 20 positive, 11 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.