Paper · 2015 · Julius Kühn-Institut

Rootstock and seasonal variations affect anthocyanin accumulation and quality traits of ‘Kyoho’ grape berries in subtropical double cropping system

Chou, Ming-Yi; Li, Kuo-Tan

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The double cropping system has been commercially adopted in subtropical viticulture regions. However, very limited information about rootstock and seasonal effects on berry quality traits are available for this unique production system. Developing ‘Kyoho’ berries from own-rooted vines and from vines on 5C and 1202C rootstocks were periodically sampled from veraison until harvest in two consecutive cropping cycles to document the potential seasonal influence on rootstock effects. Anthocyanin concentration in berry skin, total soluble solids content (TSS), and titratable acidity (TA) were analyzed. In both cropping cycles, own-rooted vines produced berries with the highest anthocyanin concentration while vines on 1202C produced berries with the lowest anthocyanin concentration among the three scion/rootstocks. Anthocyanin concentrations were not differentiated by the differential climate pattern between the summer and the winter cropping cycles. Berries of own-rooted ‘Kyoho’ and ‘Kyoho’/5C vines accumulated satisfactory and equal amount of TSS in both cropping cycles. 1202C rootstocks did not affect berry TSS in the summer cropping cycle but reduced TSS in the winter cropping cycle. Significant rootstock and seasonal effects on berry TA were detected. Own-rooted vines produced berries with the lowest TA while vines on 1202C produced berries with the highest TA among the three scion/rootstock combinations. TA of berries from the winter cropping cycle was significantly higher than that from the summer cropping cycle especially in ‘Kyoho’/1202C. Relationships between anthocyanins and TSS of developing berries after veraison properly fitted into a sigmoidal function regardless of rootstocks and cropping cycles. However, the duration of the initial lag phase, the onset and the trend of both quality triats in the increasing phase, and the presence and degree of the final lag phase in the relationship were all modulated by rootstocks and by seasonal variations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Own-rooted vines produced berries with the highest anthocyanin concentration among the grape scion/rootstock combinations.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
own-rooted vinese0
Outcome
anthocyanin concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
vines on 1202Ce1

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“own-rooted vines produced berries with the highest anthocyanin concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“vines on 1202C produced berries with the lowest anthocyanin concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines on 1202C produced berries with the lowest anthocyanin concentration.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
vines on 1202Ce0
Outcome
anthocyanin concentratione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
own-rooted vinese1

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“vines on 1202C produced berries with the lowest anthocyanin concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“own-rooted vines produced berries with the highest anthocyanin concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–705 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin concentrations did not differ between the summer and the winter cropping cycles.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
Anthocyanin concentrationse0
Direction
not differentiatede0
Setting
summer and the winter cropping cyclese0

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Anthocyanin concentrations were not differentiated by the differential climate pattern between the summer and the winter cropping cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berries of own-rooted and 5C-rootstocked Kyoho vines accumulated equal amounts of TSS in both cropping cycles.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
/5C vinese0
Outcome
amount of TSSe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
in both cropping cyclese0
Comparator
own-rootede0

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Berries of own-rooted ‘Kyoho’ and ‘Kyoho’/5C vines accumulated satisfactory and equal amount of TSS in both cropping cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1202C rootstocks did not affect berry TSS in the summer cropping cycle.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
1202C rootstockse0
Outcome
berry TSSe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
in the summer cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“1202C rootstocks did not affect berry TSS in the summer cropping cycle but reduced TSS in the winter cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1202C rootstocks reduced berry TSS in the winter cropping cycle.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
1202C rootstockse0
Outcome
berry TSSe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in the winter cropping cyclee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“1202C rootstocks did not affect berry TSS in the summer cropping cycle but reduced TSS in the winter cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1198 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock and seasonal effects on berry TA were significant.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocke0
Outcome
berry TAe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant rootstock and seasonal effects on berry TA were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Own-rooted vines produced berries with the lowest titratable acidity (TA).

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Own-rooted vinese0
Outcome
TAe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
vines on 1202Ce1

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Own-rooted vines produced berries with the lowest TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“vines on 1202C produced berries with the highest TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines on 1202C produced berries with the highest titratable acidity (TA).

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
vines on 1202Ce0
Outcome
TAe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Own-rooted vinese1

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“vines on 1202C produced berries with the highest TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1380 · show in text ↑
e1

“Own-rooted vines produced berries with the lowest TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1322 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TA of berries from the winter cropping cycle was significantly higher than that from the summer cropping cycle.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
TA of berriese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
summer cropping cyclee0
Setting
winter cropping cyclee0

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“TA of berries from the winter cropping cycle was significantly higher than that from the summer cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin and TSS of developing berries after veraison fitted a sigmoidal function regardless of rootstock and cropping cycle.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
Relationships between anthocyanins and TSS of developing berriese0
Qualifier
sigmoidal functione0

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relationships between anthocyanins and TSS of developing berries after veraison properly fitted into a sigmoidal function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1688 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The duration of the initial lag phase, the onset and the trend of the quality traits were modulated by rootstocks and seasonal variations.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocks and by seasonal variationse0
Outcome
the duration of the initial lag phase, the onset and the trende0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“the duration of the initial lag phase, the onset and the trend of both quality triats in the increasing phase, and the presence and degree of the final lag phase in the relationship were all modulated by rootstocks and by seasonal variations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence and degree of the final lag phase were modulated by rootstocks and seasonal variations.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocks and by seasonal variationse0
Outcome
the presence and degree of the final lag phasee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“grape berries in subtropical double cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“the duration of the initial lag phase, the onset and the trend of both quality triats in the increasing phase, and the presence and degree of the final lag phase in the relationship were all modulated by rootstocks and by seasonal variations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1985 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.