Paper · 2004 · HortScience

Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape

Manuel de Jesus Valenzuela-Ruiz; Fabian Robles-Contreras; Raul Leonel Grijalva-Contreras; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the Northwest of Mexico, grape is one of the main crops, specially for table grape (18,000 ha), the `Flame seedless' is one of the important cultivars. Some of the main problems present in this region is the shortage and high cost of the water, nematode and salinity. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of `Harmony' rootstock on `Flame seedless' for table grape. This study was caried in the INIFAP Caborca during 2001 cycle and consisted of ten plants of `Flame Seedless' on `Harmony' rootstock and ten control plants under the drip irrigation system, the statistical design used was completely randomized. The results obtained observe not negative effect for the `Harmony' rootstock on the phenology of `Flame seedless' (budbreak, flowering and color develpment). The effect was positive since harvest date advanced in 4 days (4 June), where as the control harvest was in 8 June, as far as color were no differences, because both treatments colored well, as far as quality this was better on rootstock than that was not grafted (greather berry size and cluster uniformity). The yield was 1,200 boxes/ha when we used rootstock, 335 boxes more than control and obtaining a saving cost of 100% in the nematode control and 30% in water consumption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony rootstock had no negative effect on Flame Seedless phenology.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
`Harmony' rootstocke0
Outcome
phenology of `Flame seedless'e0
Direction
not negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“not negative effect for the `Harmony' rootstock on the phenology of `Flame seedless' (budbreak, flowering and color develpment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony rootstock advanced harvest by four days versus the control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
`Harmony' rootstocke1
Outcome
harvest datee0
Direction
advancede0
Value
4 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“harvest date advanced in 4 days (4 June), where as the control harvest was in 8 June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–911 · show in text ↑
e1

“not negative effect for the `Harmony' rootstock on the phenology of `Flame seedless' (budbreak, flowering and color develpment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry color did not differ between rootstock and control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
`Harmony' rootstocke1
Outcome
colore0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
both treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“as far as color were no differences, because both treatments colored well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“not negative effect for the `Harmony' rootstock on the phenology of `Flame seedless' (budbreak, flowering and color develpment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock improved berry size and cluster uniformity relative to ungrafted vines.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocke0
Outcome
berry size and cluster uniformitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
not graftede0

Verbatim

e0

“quality this was better on rootstock than that was not grafted (greather berry size and cluster uniformity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted vines yielded 1,200 boxes/ha, 335 boxes more than controls.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
rootstocke0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
1,200 boxes/hae0
Qualifier
335 boxese0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield was 1,200 boxes/ha when we used rootstock, 335 boxes more than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock use saved 100% of nematode-control cost.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
`Harmony' rootstocke1
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pest
Outcome
saving coste0
Direction
savinge0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“obtaining a saving cost of 100% in the nematode control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“not negative effect for the `Harmony' rootstock on the phenology of `Flame seedless' (budbreak, flowering and color develpment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock use reduced water consumption by 30%.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
`Harmony' rootstocke1
Outcome
water consumptione0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“30% in water consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1276 · show in text ↑
e1

“not negative effect for the `Harmony' rootstock on the phenology of `Flame seedless' (budbreak, flowering and color develpment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the Harmony Rootstock on Yield and Qualiy `Flame Seedless' Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · VitisResults differ

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

grafting · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

grafting · Nematoda · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.