Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at research and demonstration block of Research Institute on Organic Farming (RIOF), UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru during 2017-2018 to study the combined effect of different sources of organic manures, decomposers on enzymatic activity and microbial dynamics of rhizosphere soil of chilli. The experiment was laid out on Factorial Randomized Block Design with 12treatments and replicated thrice. Irrespective of decomposers treatments, application of vermicompost on N equivalent basis had recorded significantly higher chilli yield (20.47 and 23.09 t ha-1) and stalk yield (5.28 and 6.15 t ha-1) as compared to the application of poultry manure (19.40 and 21.85 t ha-1, 5.01 and 5.83 t ha-1), sheep manure (18.83 and 21.19 t ha-1, 4.86 and 5.65 t ha-1) and FYM (18.27 and 20.54 t ha-1, 4.74 and 5.50 t ha-1).Application of jeevamrutha to soil had recorded significantly higher chilli yield (18.27 and 20.54 t ha-1) and stalk yield (4.74 and 5.50 t ha-1) as compared to application of microbial consortia (20.17 and 22.74 t ha-1, 5.21 and 6.07 t ha-1) and NCOF-decomposer (16.24 and 18.20 t ha-1, 4.2 and 4.88 t ha-1).Application of vermicompost had recorded significantly higher bacterial population (27.15 × 105 and 30.29 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil, respectively) as compared to FYM (24.23 × 105 and 26.87 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil), poultry manure (25.73 × 105 and 28.63 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil)and sheep manures(24.97 × 105 and 27.74 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil).Application of jeevamrutha recorded significantly higher bacterial population (28.27 × 105 and 31.59 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil, respectively) as compared to NCOF- decomposer (21.54 and 23.73 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil, respectively). Interaction effects of these factors didn’t differ significantly.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost gave significantly higher chilli yield than the other manures.
Verbatim
e0“application of vermicompost on N equivalent basis had recorded significantly higher chilli yield (20.47 and 23.09 t ha-1) and stalk yield (5.28 and 6.15 t ha-1) as compared to the application of poultry manure (19.40 and 21.85 t ha-1, 5.01 and 5.83 t ha-1), sheep manure (18.83 and 21.19 t ha-1, 4.86 and 5.65 t ha-1) and FYM (18.27 and 20.54 t ha-1, 4.74 and 5.50 t ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Jeevamrutha was reported to give significantly higher chilli yield than comparator decomposers, despite inconsistent printed values.
Verbatim
e0“Application of jeevamrutha to soil had recorded significantly higher chilli yield (18.27 and 20.54 t ha-1) and stalk yield (4.74 and 5.50 t ha-1) as compared to application of microbial consortia (20.17 and 22.74 t ha-1, 5.21 and 6.07 t ha-1) and NCOF-decomposer (16.24 and 18.20 t ha-1, 4.2 and 4.88 t ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Jeevamrutha was reported to give significantly higher stalk yield than comparator decomposers, despite inconsistent printed values.
Verbatim
e0“Application of jeevamrutha to soil had recorded significantly higher chilli yield (18.27 and 20.54 t ha-1) and stalk yield (4.74 and 5.50 t ha-1) as compared to application of microbial consortia (20.17 and 22.74 t ha-1, 5.21 and 6.07 t ha-1) and NCOF-decomposer (16.24 and 18.20 t ha-1, 4.2 and 4.88 t ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost produced significantly higher rhizosphere bacterial population than other manures.
Verbatim
e0“Application of vermicompost had recorded significantly higher bacterial population (27.15 × 105 and 30.29 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil, respectively) as compared to FYM (24.23 × 105 and 26.87 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil), poultry manure (25.73 × 105 and 28.63 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil)and sheep manures(24.97 × 105 and 27.74 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil)”
t0“Rhizosphere Soil of Chilli”
Claim · model-written summary
Jeevamrutha produced significantly higher soil bacterial population than NCOF-decomposer.
Verbatim
e0“Application of jeevamrutha recorded significantly higher bacterial population (28.27 × 105 and 31.59 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil, respectively) as compared to NCOF- decomposer (21.54 and 23.73 × 105 CFU g-1 of soil, respectively)”
t0“Rhizosphere Soil of Chilli”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of manure and decomposer factors did not differ significantly.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“Interaction effects of these factors didn’t differ significantly”
t0“Organic Manures and Decomposers on Enzymatic Activity and Microbial Dynamics of Rhizosphere Soil of Chilli”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
151 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
159 papers more in this group
See all 163 papers →fertilization · soil: biology · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.