Paper · 2017 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

ROLE OF BIOEFFECTORS AND SOIL AMELIORATES ON COWPEA YIELD GROWN ON SALINE SOIL WITH AID OF 15N ISOTOPE DILUTION TECHNIQUE

Abd El-Hakim, Ahmed M.; El-Sherbiny, A. E.; Dahdouh, S. M.; et al.

17
claims
41
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on salt affected soil cultivated with cowpea crop (Vigna unguiculata)under drip irrigation system to evaluate the impact of using mineral fertilizer, fulvic acid, and seaweeds with or without bio-inoculation to combat soil salinity stress. All soil ameliorates were applied in combination with or without Aspergillus terreus inoculation. Seeds of cowpea plants were inoculated with Bradyrhizobium spp for all fertilization and amendment treatments. 15N isotope dilution technique was followed to accurately distinguish between N-derived sources gained by cowpea crop. Results indicated that shoot fresh weight of plants treated with full dose of mineral fertilizer was enhanced by fungal inoculation comparing to the un-inoculated plants. Similar trend, but to somewhat lower extent, was noticed with both root and seeds. Fresh weight of shoot, root and seeds of plants either inoculated or not were decreased, except shoot of un-inoculated one, when seaweeds were added as compared to those fertilized with mineral fertilizer. Similar trend, but to somewhat higher extent, was noticed with fulvic acid treatment. Contrary, seeds of plants were severely decreased in the presence of fulvic acid comparing to those treated with seaweeds or mineral N-fertilizer. The positive effect of fungal inoculation on enhancement of fresh weight was noticed with plants fertilized with mineral N-fertilizer. Nitrogen uptake by shoots of inoculated plants was higher in case of mineral fertilizer than those recorded with seaweeds but nearly similar to those induced by application of fulvic acid. In contrast, the un-inoculated plants didn't reflect any significant variation between the fertilization treatments. N uptake was increased with application of mineral fertilizer comparing to those resulted from application of seaweeds or fulvic acid. But the effect was not significant in fungal inoculated plants. N uptake by seeds of inoculated plants fertilized with full dose of mineral fertilizer was higher than those of plants treated with fulvic acid but nearly closed to those induced by addition of seaweeds. The highest values of nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff) were recorded with application of mineral fertilizer. This holds true for all plant organs. Remarkable enhancement of Ndff was noticed in case of fungal inoculated plants comparing to the un-inoculated ones. Nitrogen derived from air (%Ndfa) ranged from 35% up to more than 60% depending on plant organ and fungal or non-fungal inoculation treatments. Ndfa were higher in un-inoculated plants than those recorded with the inoculated one. Seeds accumulate more Ndfa than roots or shoot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation increased shoot fresh weight under full mineral fertilizer.

Treatment
fungal inoculatione0
Interactor
Aspergillus terreusAspergillus terreuse1othere0
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus terreus
Aspergillus terreus · InteractorMedmyco at English Wikipedia · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot fresh weight of plants treated with full dose of mineral fertilizer was enhanced by fungal inoculation comparing to the un-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“All soil ameliorates were applied in combination with or without Aspergillus terreus inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation similarly increased root and seed fresh weight to a lesser extent.

Treatment
fungal inoculatione1
Outcome
root and seedse0
Qualifier
somewhat lower extente0
Comparator
un-inoculated plantse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend, but to somewhat lower extent, was noticed with both root and seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that shoot fresh weight of plants treated with full dose of mineral fertilizer was enhanced by fungal inoculation comparing to the un-inoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweeds reduced shoot, root and seed fresh weight relative to mineral fertilizer, except uninoculated shoots.

Treatment
seaweedse0
Outcome
Fresh weight of shoot, root and seedse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except shoot of un-inoculated onee0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh weight of shoot, root and seeds of plants either inoculated or not were decreased, except shoot of un-inoculated one, when seaweeds were added as compared to those fertilized with mineral fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid similarly reduced fresh weight more than seaweeds.

Treatment
fulvic acid treatmente0
Outcome
fresh weighte1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trend, but to somewhat higher extent, was noticed with fulvic acid treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh weight of shoot, root and seeds of plants either inoculated or not were decreased, except shoot of un-inoculated one, when seaweeds were added as compared to those fertilized with mineral fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid severely reduced seed fresh weight compared with seaweeds or mineral fertilizer.

Treatment
fulvic acide0
Outcome
seedse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
seaweeds or mineral N-fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seeds of plants were severely decreased in the presence of fulvic acid comparing to those treated with seaweeds or mineral N-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In inoculated plants, shoot nitrogen uptake was higher with mineral fertilizer than seaweeds.

Treatment
mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptake by shootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
seaweedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake by shoots of inoculated plants was higher in case of mineral fertilizer than those recorded with seaweeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In inoculated plants, shoot nitrogen uptake under mineral fertilizer was nearly similar to fulvic acid.

Treatment
fulvic acide0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptake by shootse1
Direction
nearly similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but nearly similar to those induced by application of fulvic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1616 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen uptake by shoots of inoculated plants was higher in case of mineral fertilizer than those recorded with seaweeds but nearly similar to those induced by application of fulvic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1617 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated plants showed no significant nitrogen uptake variation between fertilizers.

Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
significant variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the un-inoculated plants didn't reflect any significant variation between the fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen uptake by shoots of inoculated plants was higher in case of mineral fertilizer than those recorded with seaweeds but nearly similar to those induced by application of fulvic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer increased nitrogen uptake relative to seaweeds or fulvic acid.

Treatment
mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
seaweeds or fulvic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake was increased with application of mineral fertilizer comparing to those resulted from application of seaweeds or fulvic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer effect on nitrogen uptake was not significant in fungal inoculated plants.

Outcome
N uptakee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“But the effect was not significant in fungal inoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1933 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“N uptake was increased with application of mineral fertilizer comparing to those resulted from application of seaweeds or fulvic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed nitrogen uptake with mineral fertilizer was higher than with fulvic acid in inoculated plants.

Treatment
full dose of mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
N uptake by seedse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fulvic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake by seeds of inoculated plants fertilized with full dose of mineral fertilizer was higher than those of plants treated with fulvic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2077 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed nitrogen uptake under mineral fertilizer was close to seaweeds.

Outcome
N uptake by seedse1
Direction
nearly closede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but nearly closed to those induced by addition of seaweeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2078–2136 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“N uptake by seeds of inoculated plants fertilized with full dose of mineral fertilizer was higher than those of plants treated with fulvic acid but nearly closed to those induced by addition of seaweeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer gave the highest fertilizer-derived nitrogen in all organs.

Treatment
mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff)e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
all plant organse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff) were recorded with application of mineral fertilizer. This holds true for all plant organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2291 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation increased fertilizer-derived nitrogen.

Treatment
fungal inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Ndffe0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
un-inoculated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Remarkable enhancement of Ndff was noticed in case of fungal inoculated plants comparing to the un-inoculated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2292–2407 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-derived nitrogen ranged from 35% to over 60% across organs and inoculation treatments.

Outcome
Nitrogen derived from air (%Ndfa)e0
Value
35% up to more than 60%e0
Qualifier
depending on plant organ and fungal or non-fungal inoculation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen derived from air (%Ndfa) ranged from 35% up to more than 60% depending on plant organ and fungal or non-fungal inoculation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2408–2551 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated plants had higher air-derived nitrogen than inoculated plants.

Outcome
Ndfae0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ndfa were higher in un-inoculated plants than those recorded with the inoculated one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2552–2637 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds accumulated more air-derived nitrogen than roots or shoots.

Organ / stage
Seedse0
Outcome
Ndfae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
roots or shoote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds accumulate more Ndfa than roots or shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2638–2685 · show in text ↑
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

other · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.