Paper · 2010 · The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya)

The Performance of Durum and Bread Wheat Genotypes Associated with Yield and Yield Component under Different Water Deficit Conditions

Ali Moayedi; Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce; Syed Shahar Barakbah

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Although drought stress has been well documented as an effective parameter in decreasing crop production in arid and semi arid regions, developing and releasing new varieties which are adaptable to water deficit conditions can be a constructive program to overcome unsuitable environmental conditions. The present study was carried out to study the performance of durum and bread wheat genotypes in relation to yield and yield component under different water deficit conditions. The experiment was laid out in split plot based on a complete randomized block design, with three replications at Mashhad Agricultural Research stations in Iran. Irrigation regimes were considered as the main plots and included four levels. Sub-plots were assigned to five wheat genotypes, four durum promising lines and a bread wheat cultivar. The number of spike m -2, number of kernel spike -1 1000-kernel weight, plant height, day to maturity, maturity duration, harvest index, and grain yield were highly significant (P<0.01) affected by water deficit conditions and genotype effects. In addition to this, the effect of genotype on the biological and grain yield was significant (P<0.05). It was observed that water limitation significantly decreased plant height in the early water deficit, while water limitation during double ridge to anthesis reduced the number of spike m -and2 number of kernel spike -1. Besides, water deficit condition at post-anthesis decreased the number of day to maturity, maturity duration, 1000-kernel weight, harvest index and grain yield. Chamran bread wheat cultivar and a promising durum wheat genotype (RASCON37/BEJAH7) produced the highest values for the plant height, kernel numbers, harvest index traits and lastly grain yield compared to all the other genotypes. © 2010, INSInet Publication.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit and genotype significantly affected yield components and maturity traits.

Treatment
water deficit conditionse0
Outcome
number of spike m -2, number of kernel spike -1 1000-kernel weighte0
Value
P<0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of spike m -2, number of kernel spike -1 1000-kernel weight, plant height, day to maturity, maturity duration, harvest index, and grain yield were highly significant (P<0.01) affected by water deficit conditions and genotype effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected biological yield.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
biologicale0
Value
P<0.05e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of genotype on the biological and grain yield was significant (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected grain yield.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
P<0.05e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of genotype on the biological and grain yield was significant (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early water deficit significantly decreased plant height.

Treatment
water limitatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
early water deficite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water limitation significantly decreased plant height in the early water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit from double ridge to anthesis reduced spike number.

Treatment
water limitation during double ridge to anthesise0
Outcome
number of spikee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water limitation during double ridge to anthesis reduced the number of spike m -and2 number of kernel spike -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit from double ridge to anthesis reduced kernels per spike.

Treatment
water limitation during double ridge to anthesise0
Outcome
number of kernel spike -1e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water limitation during double ridge to anthesis reduced the number of spike m -and2 number of kernel spike -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postanthesis deficit decreased days to maturity and maturity duration.

Treatment
water deficit condition at post-anthesise0
Outcome
day to maturity, maturity duratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit condition at post-anthesis decreased the number of day to maturity, maturity duration, 1000-kernel weight, harvest index and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postanthesis deficit decreased 1000-kernel weight.

Treatment
water deficit condition at post-anthesise0
Outcome
1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit condition at post-anthesis decreased the number of day to maturity, maturity duration, 1000-kernel weight, harvest index and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postanthesis deficit decreased harvest index.

Treatment
water deficit condition at post-anthesise0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit condition at post-anthesis decreased the number of day to maturity, maturity duration, 1000-kernel weight, harvest index and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postanthesis deficit decreased grain yield.

Treatment
water deficit condition at post-anthesise0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficit condition at post-anthesis decreased the number of day to maturity, maturity duration, 1000-kernel weight, harvest index and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamran had the highest height, kernel number, harvest index and grain yield among genotypes.

Material
Chamrane0
Outcome
plant height, kernel numbers, harvest index traitse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chamran bread wheat cultivar and a promising durum wheat genotype (RASCON37/BEJAH7) produced the highest values for the plant height, kernel numbers, harvest index traits and lastly grain yield compared to all the other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RASCON37/BEJAH7 had the highest height, kernel number, harvest index and grain yield among genotypes.

Material
RASCON37/BEJAH7e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chamran bread wheat cultivar and a promising durum wheat genotype (RASCON37/BEJAH7) produced the highest values for the plant height, kernel numbers, harvest index traits and lastly grain yield compared to all the other genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum and Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

drought · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

17 papers: 0 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.