Paper · 2016 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Response of different wheat genotypes to drought and heat stresses during grain filling stage

Sanaa I.M. Milad; Ali I. Nawar; Ahmed Shaalan; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study was carried out to study the performance of durum and bread wheat genotypes in relation to grain filling process, under water and heat stresses. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replicates at Fuka Research Station, Faculty of Desert and Environmental Agriculture, Matrouh Governorate (North West Coast of Egypt) in 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 winter seasons. Environmental conditions were considered as the main plots and included four environments (normal, drought, heat, heat and drought conditions). Sub plots were assigned to fourteen durum and bread wheat genotypes. The results revealed significant variations between studied environments for number of grains per spike (NGS), one-hundred grain weight (HGW) and grain yield (GY). However, number of fertile tiller (NFT) was insignificantly influenced by environments. Wheat varieties significantly differed for the studied four traits, whereas, the environment x variety interaction significantly influenced NFT and GY only in both seasons. Grain yield, as an average of the two seasons, was reduced by 26.03, 43.07 and 58.28 percentages at drought, heat and combined drought and heat, respectively, compared to normal conditions. All wheat genotypes suffered with application of combined drought and heat stresses in both seasons. Wheat genotypes varied in their response to heat stress conditions where Beni suef 3 and Sohag 3 (durum wheat) and Sids 1 and Giza 168 (bread wheat) showed comparatively higher tolerance to heat stress. In addition, stability analysis revealed a differential response of wheat varieties (b value) to individual or combined drought and heat stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environments significantly varied in grains per spike, hundred grain weight and grain yield.

Taxon
graine0
Outcome
number of grains per spike (NGS), one-hundred grain weight (HGW) and grain yield (GY)e0

Verbatim

e0

“significant variations between studied environments for number of grains per spike (NGS), one-hundred grain weight (HGW) and grain yield (GY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment did not significantly influence fertile tiller number.

Outcome
number of fertile tiller (NFT)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“number of fertile tiller (NFT) was insignificantly influenced by environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat varieties significantly differed for the four studied traits.

Outcome
studied four traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat varieties significantly differed for the studied four traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–931 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Environment by variety interaction significantly influenced fertile tiller number and grain yield in both seasons.

Treatment
environment x variety interactione0
Outcome
NFT and GYe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the environment x variety interaction significantly influenced NFT and GY only in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced wheat grain yield by 26.03% versus normal conditions.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
26.03e0
Comparator
normal conditionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, as an average of the two seasons, was reduced by 26.03, 43.07 and 58.28 percentages at drought, heat and combined drought and heat, respectively, compared to normal conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat reduced wheat grain yield by 43.07% versus normal conditions.

Treatment
heate0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
43.07e0
Comparator
normal conditionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, as an average of the two seasons, was reduced by 26.03, 43.07 and 58.28 percentages at drought, heat and combined drought and heat, respectively, compared to normal conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drought and heat reduced wheat grain yield by 58.28% versus normal conditions.

Treatment
combined drought and heate0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
58.28e0
Comparator
normal conditionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, as an average of the two seasons, was reduced by 26.03, 43.07 and 58.28 percentages at drought, heat and combined drought and heat, respectively, compared to normal conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beni suef 3, Sohag 3, Sids 1 and Giza 168 had comparatively higher heat tolerance.

Material
Beni suef 3 and Sohag 3e0
Outcome
tolerance to heat stresse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beni suef 3 and Sohag 3 (durum wheat) and Sids 1 and Giza 168 (bread wheat) showed comparatively higher tolerance to heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1531 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stability analysis found differing genotype responses to individual or combined drought and heat stress.

Treatment
individual or combined drought and heat stresse0
Outcome
differential responsee0
Direction
differentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stability analysis revealed a differential response of wheat varieties (b value) to individual or combined drought and heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1675 · show in text ↑

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.