Paper · 2016 · Genetika

Yield and yield traits of durum wheat (Triticum durum desf.) and bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under drought stress

Tofig Allahverdiyev

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of water stress on yield and yield traits of durum wheat and bread wheat genotypes. Water stress caused significant reduction in plant height (PH), peduncle length (PL), spike number/m2(SN), spike length (SL), spike width (SW), spikelets number/spike (SNS), spike mass (SM), grain number/spike (GNS), grain mass/spike (GMS), biological yield (BY), thousand kernel mass (TKM), grain yield (GY) and harvest index (HI). Wheat traits such as SN, SM, BY, TKM, GY were more vulnerable to drought stress. Positive significant correlation of GY with SN, BY and HI under rain-fed condition was found. Genotypes of durum wheat were more sensitive to drought than that bread wheat genotypes. The significant and positive correlation of GY with Stress Tolerance Index (STI), Mean Productivity (MP) and Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) indicated that these indices were more effective in identifying high yielding, drought tolerance genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced plant height, peduncle length and spike number/m2 in wheat.

Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
plant height (PH), peduncle length (PL), spike number/m2(SN)e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress caused significant reduction in plant height (PH), peduncle length (PL), spike number/m2(SN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–240 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced spike length, spike width and spikelets number/spike in wheat.

Treatment
Water stresse1
Outcome
spike length (SL), spike width (SW), spikelets number/spike (SNS)e0
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length (SL), spike width (SW), spikelets number/spike (SNS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–307 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water stress caused significant reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–176 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced spike mass, grain number/spike and grain mass/spike in wheat.

Treatment
Water stresse1
Outcome
spike mass (SM), grain number/spike (GNS), grain mass/spike (GMS)e0
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike mass (SM), grain number/spike (GNS), grain mass/spike (GMS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water stress caused significant reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–176 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced biological yield, thousand kernel mass and grain yield in wheat.

Treatment
Water stresse1
Outcome
biological yield (BY), thousand kernel mass (TKM), grain yield (GY)e0
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological yield (BY), thousand kernel mass (TKM), grain yield (GY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–443 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water stress caused significant reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–176 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly reduced harvest index in wheat.

Treatment
Water stresse1
Outcome
harvest index (HI)e0
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (HI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–466 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water stress caused significant reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–176 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike number, spike mass, biological yield, thousand kernel mass and grain yield were more vulnerable to drought stress than other wheat traits.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Wheat traits such as SN, SM, BY, TKM, GYe0
Direction
more vulnerablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat traits such as SN, SM, BY, TKM, GY were more vulnerable to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–547 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield showed significant positive correlation with spike number, biological yield and harvest index under rain-fed condition.

Outcome
GY with SN, BY and HIe0
Direction
Positivee0
Setting
rain-fed conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive significant correlation of GY with SN, BY and HI under rain-fed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat genotypes were more sensitive to drought than bread wheat genotypes.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
bread wheat genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes of durum wheat were more sensitive to drought than that bread wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–730 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant positive correlation of grain yield with STI, MP and GMP indicated these indices were more effective in identifying high-yielding, drought-tolerant genotypes.

Outcome
more effective in identifying high yielding, drought tolerance genotypese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The significant and positive correlation of GY with Stress Tolerance Index (STI), Mean Productivity (MP) and Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) indicated that these indices were more effective in identifying high yielding, drought tolerance genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–981 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.