Paper · 2020 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Growth of ‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.) is altered by photoperiod and nitrogen conditioning

Edward F. Durner

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influences of photoperiod and nitrogen plug conditioning for summer planting of ‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) for off-season plasticulture production were evaluated in two separate experiments in New Jersey, USA. In experiment one, plants were conditioned in the greenhouse under ND (natural daylength), LD (ND supplemented with 24 h incandescent radiation (Phillips Duramax Soft White A19 60 watt) or LD7W (ND supplemented with 24 h incandescent radiation (C9, 7 watt bulbs) followed by elevated nitrogen (800 ppm) for 0 to 4 weeks. In experiment two, plants were conditioned in the greenhouse under ND or LD followed by elevated nitrogen (800 ppm) for 4 weeks. In experiment one, flowering was enhanced by LD conditioning. The 24LD7W treatment was more effective than the 24LD treatment in eliciting a long day response at low levels of N (0 and 1 week of elevated N) but not at higher levels of N (2 to 4 weeks of elevated N). No treatment effects were observed for fruit production. In the second experiment, flowering was enhanced by LD or elevated N. Elevated nitrogen during conditioning slightly enhanced yield through 11 September while photoperiod during conditioning did not affect productivity. Runner production was minimal in both experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-day conditioning enhanced flowering in experiment one.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Treatment
LD conditioninge0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In experiment one, flowering was enhanced by LD conditioning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

24LD7W elicited a stronger long-day response than 24LD at low nitrogen conditioning.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Treatment
24LD7W treatmente0
Outcome
long day responsee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
low levels of N (0 and 1 week of elevated N)e0
Comparator
24LD treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 24LD7W treatment was more effective than the 24LD treatment in eliciting a long day response at low levels of N (0 and 1 week of elevated N) but not at higher levels of N (2 to 4 weeks of elevated N).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 24LD7W advantage was absent at higher nitrogen levels.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Treatment
24LD7W treatmente0
Outcome
long day responsee0
Qualifier
higher levels of N (2 to 4 weeks of elevated N)e0
Comparator
24LD treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 24LD7W treatment was more effective than the 24LD treatment in eliciting a long day response at low levels of N (0 and 1 week of elevated N) but not at higher levels of N (2 to 4 weeks of elevated N).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly alter fruit production in experiment one.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Outcome
fruit productione0
Direction
No treatment effectse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No treatment effects were observed for fruit production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-day conditioning enhanced flowering in experiment two.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Treatment
LDe0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second experiment, flowering was enhanced by LD or elevated N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated nitrogen enhanced flowering in experiment two.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Treatment
elevated Ne0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second experiment, flowering was enhanced by LD or elevated N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated nitrogen slightly increased yield through 11 September.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Treatment
Elevated nitrogen during conditioninge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
through 11 Septembere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated nitrogen during conditioning slightly enhanced yield through 11 September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod conditioning did not affect productivity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Treatment
photoperiod during conditioninge0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photoperiod during conditioning did not affect productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Runner production was minimal in both experiments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Seascape’t0
Outcome
Runner productione0
Direction
minimale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Runner production was minimal in both experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Seascape’ strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–59 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

60 papers: 48 positive, 12 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

light · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

61 papers: 46 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.