Paper · 2019 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Nutrient omission plot technique for yield response, indigenous nutrient supply and nutrient use efficiency estimation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) crop in Andaman & Nicobar Islands

B Gangaiah

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A nutrient omission plot technique (NOPT) study in RCBD with 8 treatments (omission (-) of N, P, K, NP, NK, PK and no nutrient omission)and 3 replicates per treatment was made on rice at Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands during kharif 2015 to ascertain yield response and find out the most crucial nutrient for fertilization.The results revealed that yield response to fertilizers (NPK) was 2.63 t / ha (60.74%). The yield response of P (23.3 %) got multiplied by 2.16 and 2.60 times when combined with N and K applications as compared to their individual effects. Indigenous N, P and K supply capacity of the soil was estimated as 70.6, 10.0 and 80.0 kg/ha. Agronomic efficiency (kg grain / kg nutrient applied) was severely limited by P omission (10.13). The economics(Rs/ha) of rice cultivation indicates that omission of NPK & NP fertilizers results in losses. The highest profits realized with no omission (+NPK) were reduced by 52.3% with P omission. Omission of K followed by N and NK has less impact on profits. Rice crop duration got prolonged and shortened under P and N omission while K omission has no such effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK fertilizer produced a rice yield response of 2.63 t / ha, or 60.74%.

Treatment
fertilizers (NPK)e0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Value
2.63 t / hae0
Qualifier
60.74%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield response to fertilizers (NPK) was 2.63 t / ha (60.74%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P yield response was 23.3%.

Outcome
yield response of Pe0
Value
23.3 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response of P (23.3 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding N to P multiplied the P yield response 2.16 times.

Treatment
combined with Ne0
Outcome
yield response of Pe0
Direction
multipliede0
Value
2.16e0
Comparator
their individual effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response of P (23.3 %) got multiplied by 2.16 and 2.60 times when combined with N and K applications as compared to their individual effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding K to P multiplied the P yield response 2.60 times.

Treatment
K applicationse0
Outcome
yield response of Pe0
Direction
multipliede0
Value
2.60 timese0
Comparator
their individual effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response of P (23.3 %) got multiplied by 2.16 and 2.60 times when combined with N and K applications as compared to their individual effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated indigenous soil N supply was 70.6 kg/ha.

Outcome
Ne0
Value
70.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indigenous N, P and K supply capacity of the soil was estimated as 70.6, 10.0 and 80.0 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated indigenous soil P supply was 10.0 kg/ha.

Outcome
Pe0
Value
10.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indigenous N, P and K supply capacity of the soil was estimated as 70.6, 10.0 and 80.0 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated indigenous soil K supply was 80.0 kg/ha.

Outcome
K supply capacity of the soile0
Value
80.0 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indigenous N, P and K supply capacity of the soil was estimated as 70.6, 10.0 and 80.0 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P omission severely limited agronomic efficiency to 10.13 kg grain per kg nutrient.

Treatment
P omissione0
Outcome
Agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
limitede0
Value
10.13e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic efficiency (kg grain / kg nutrient applied) was severely limited by P omission (10.13)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting NPK resulted in rice cultivation losses.

Treatment
omission of NPKe0
Outcome
lossese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“omission of NPK & NP fertilizers results in losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting NP resulted in rice cultivation losses.

Treatment
NP fertilizerse0
Outcome
lossese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“omission of NPK & NP fertilizers results in losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P omission reduced profits by 52.3% relative to no omission.

Treatment
P omissione0
Outcome
profitse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
52.3%e0
Comparator
no omission (+NPK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest profits realized with no omission (+NPK) were reduced by 52.3% with P omission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting K had less impact on profits.

Treatment
Omission of Ke0
Outcome
profitse0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of K followed by N and NK has less impact on profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting N had less impact on profits.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
profitse0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of K followed by N and NK has less impact on profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting NK had less impact on profits.

Treatment
NKe0
Outcome
profitse0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omission of K followed by N and NK has less impact on profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P omission prolonged rice crop duration.

Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
crop duratione0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice crop duration got prolonged and shortened under P and N omission while K omission has no such effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N omission shortened rice crop duration.

Treatment
N omissione0
Outcome
crop duratione0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice crop duration got prolonged and shortened under P and N omission while K omission has no such effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K omission had no effect on rice crop duration.

Treatment
K omissione0
Outcome
crop duratione0
Direction
no such effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice crop duration got prolonged and shortened under P and N omission while K omission has no such effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1131 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 189 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.