Paper · 2019 · Soil Use and Management

Dynamics of zinc under long‐term application of chemical fertilizers and amendments by maize–wheat cropping sequence in Typic Hapludalfs

Shweta Shambhavi; Rakesh Kumar; Rajeev Padbhushan; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This present investigation took place on a continuing long‐term fertilizer experiment, initiated in 1972 at the experimental farm of the College of Agriculture CSK HPKV, Palampur, aimed at studying nutrient dynamics of micronutrients, especially Zn, after continuous use of chemical fertilizers and amendments over the previous 36 years in an acid Alfisol under a maize–wheat system. Treatments investigated were as follows: T 1 : Control; 100% N; 100% NP; 100% NPK (optimal application ‐ 120:26:33(maize)/25(wheat)); 100% NPK + FYM (10 t ha −1 to the maize crop); T 6 : 100% NPK + lime (900 kg ha −1 ); T 7 : 100% NPK + Zn (25 kg ha −1 as ZnSO 4 ); T 8 : 100% NPK + Hand weeding; T 9 : 100% NPK (‐S); T 10 : 150% NPK (super‐optimal application); and T 11 : 50% NPK (sub‐optimal application). Different forms of zinc in soil were determined through a sequential extraction method. Results revealed that previous applications of high‐analysis fertilizers and amendments caused a marked depletion in the pools of Zn as compared to buffer plots. All pools of Zn as well as crop productivity and Zn uptake were noticeably greater in farmyard manure (FYM)‐amended plots compared with plots not receiving fertilizer. The residual fraction was the dominant form but organically bound and exchangeable forms were found to play major role in nutrient supply, crop productivity and nutrient uptake. Correlation and regression analysis studies showed that organic forms constituted the most important pool contributing towards variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat crops. Exchangeable and organically bound forms contributed significantly towards the availability of DTPA‐extractable Zn in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous high-analysis fertilizer and amendment applications markedly depleted soil Zn pools compared with buffer plots.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse2
Treatment
previous applications of high‐analysis fertilizers and amendmentse1
Outcome
pools of Zne1
Direction
depletione1
Comparator
buffer plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that previous applications of high‐analysis fertilizers and amendments caused a marked depletion in the pools of Zn as compared to buffer plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1050 · show in text ↑
e2

“variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM-amended plots had greater Zn pools, crop productivity and Zn uptake than plots not receiving fertilizer.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse2
Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM)‐amended plotse1
Outcome
All pools of Zn as well as crop productivity and Zn uptakee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
plots not receiving fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All pools of Zn as well as crop productivity and Zn uptake were noticeably greater in farmyard manure (FYM)‐amended plots compared with plots not receiving fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1218 · show in text ↑
e2

“variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual fraction was the dominant form of soil Zn.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse2
Outcome
residual fractione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The residual fraction was the dominant form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1263 · show in text ↑
e2

“variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1579 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organically bound and exchangeable Zn forms are reported to play a major role in nutrient supply, crop productivity and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse2
Outcome
nutrient supply, crop productivity and nutrient uptakee1
Qualifier
organically bound and exchangeable forms were found to play major rolee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“organically bound and exchangeable forms were found to play major role in nutrient supply, crop productivity and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1396 · show in text ↑
e2

“variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic Zn forms were the most important pool contributing to variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Compound
organic formse1
Outcome
variation in yield and uptakee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“organic forms constituted the most important pool contributing towards variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable and organically bound Zn forms contributed significantly to the availability of DTPA-extractable Zn in soil.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse2
Compound
Exchangeable and organically bound formse1
Outcome
availability of DTPA‐extractable Zne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Exchangeable and organically bound forms contributed significantly towards the availability of DTPA‐extractable Zn in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1703 · show in text ↑
e2

“variation in yield and uptake by maize and wheat crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1579 · show in text ↑

other · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 64 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 107 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.