Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at Private Farm in El-Gammalia at District, Dakahlia at Governorate, Egypt during winter seasons of 2016 and 2017 to study the effect of some natural and chemical substances effective microorganisms (EM) at 2 l/fed, humic acid at 2kg/ fed, moringa leaf extract (MLE) at 1ml/ 32 ml, yeast extract at 50 ml/ l, potassium citrate 5 ml/ l as well as silicon 300 mg/ l and boron 50 mg/ l on vegetative growth, pod yield and quality of early sowing pea crop. The results showed that EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches, longest plant height, heaviest fresh and dry weight, largest leaf area, and gave the highest number of pods/plant, average weight of pod (gm), pod yield/plant (gm) and total pod yield (ton/fed.). pod length, pod diameter, pod thickness, total soluble solids (TSS), vitamin C (mg/100g fw), and protein contents (%) and the lowest in titrable acidity. All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment. The superior application was moringa leaf extract (MLE) followed by yeast extract and potassium citrate in both seasons, respectively. From the obtained results it could be concluded that EM at 2L/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed and sprayed moringa leaf extract at 15,25 and 35 days after sowing resulted in improving growth, yield and pod quality of pea plants grown under early sowing conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid gave more leaves and branches than the control in early sown pea.
- Taxon
- Pea Crop
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- number of leaves and branchese1
- Direction
- moree1
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid increased plant height and fresh and dry weight of early sown pea.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- longest plant height, heaviest fresh and dry weighte2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e2“longest plant height, heaviest fresh and dry weight”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid gave the largest leaf area of early sown pea.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- largest leaf areae2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e2“largest leaf area”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid gave the highest number of pods per plant.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- number of pods/plante2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e2“gave the highest number of pods/plant”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid increased average pod weight, pod yield per plant and total pod yield.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- average weight of pod (gm), pod yield/plant (gm) and total pod yield (ton/fed.)e2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e2“average weight of pod (gm), pod yield/plant (gm) and total pod yield (ton/fed.)”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid increased pod length, pod diameter and pod thickness.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- pod length, pod diameter, pod thicknesse5
- Direction
- increaseinferrede5
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e5“pod length, pod diameter, pod thickness”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid increased total soluble solids, vitamin C and protein content of pea pods.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- total soluble solids (TSS), vitamin C (mg/100g fw), and protein contents (%)e6
- Direction
- increaseinferrede6
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e6“total soluble solids (TSS), vitamin C (mg/100g fw), and protein contents (%)”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
EM plus humic acid gave the lowest titratable acidity in pea pods.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fede1
- Outcome
- titrable aciditye7
- Direction
- loweste7
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“EM at 2 l/ fed + humic acid at 2kg/ fed gave rise to more number of leaves and branches”
e7“the lowest in titrable acidity”
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar applications significantly increased all studied pea parameters compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- All foliar applicationse3
- Outcome
- all the studied parameterse3
- Direction
- significantly increasede3
- Comparator
- control treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“All foliar applications significantly increased all the studied parameters compared with the control treatment”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
Claim · model-written summary
Moringa leaf extract was the superior foliar application, followed by yeast extract and potassium citrate.
- Taxon
- Pea CropLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- moringa leaf extract (MLE)e4
- Outcome
- superior applicatione4
- Direction
- superiore4
- Comparator
- yeast extract and potassium citratee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The superior application was moringa leaf extract (MLE) followed by yeast extract and potassium citrate in both seasons”
t0“Response of Early Sowing Pea Crop to some Natural and Chemical Substances for Improving Yield and Quality and Components”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →other · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →other · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
other · quality: sugar starch · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.