Paper · 2019 · Weed Technology

Integration of residual herbicides with cover crop termination in soybean

Derek M. Whalen; Lovreet S. Shergill; Lyle P. Kinne; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Cover crops have increased in popularity in midwestern U.S. corn and soybean systems in recent years. However, little research has been conducted to evaluate how cover crops and residual herbicides are effectively integrated together for weed control in a soybean production system. Field studies were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to evaluate summer annual weed control and to determine the effect of cover crop biomass on residual herbicide reaching the soil. The herbicide treatments consisted of preplant (PP) applications of glyphosate plus 2,4-D with or without sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron at two different timings, 21 and 7 d prior to soybean planting (DPP). Cover crops evaluated included winter vetch, cereal rye, Italian ryegrass, oat, Austrian winter pea, winter wheat, and a winter vetch plus cereal rye mixture. Herbicide treatments were applied to tilled and nontilled soil without cover crop for comparison. The tillage treatment resulted in low weed biomass at all collection intervals after both application timings, which corresponded to tilled soil having the highest sulfentrazone concentration (171 ng g −1 ) compared with all cover crop treatments. When applied PP, herbicide treatments applied 21 DPP with sulfentrazone had greater weed (93%) and waterhemp (89%) control than when applied 7 DPP (60% and 69%, respectively). When applied POST, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicide resulted in greater weed and waterhemp control at 7 DPP (83% and 77%, respectively) than at 21 DPP (74% and 61%, respectively). Herbicide programs that included a residual herbicide had the highest soybean yields (≥3,403 kg ha −1 ). Results from this study indicate that residual herbicides can be effectively integrated either PP or POST in conjunction with cover crop termination applications, but termination timing and biomass accumulation will affect the amount of sulfentrazone reaching the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage gave low weed biomass at all collection intervals compared with cover crop treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillage treatmente1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Comparator
cover crop treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e1

“The tillage treatment resulted in low weed biomass at all collection intervals after both application timings, which corresponded to tilled soil having the highest sulfentrazone concentration (171 ng g −1) compared with all cover crop treatments”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 932–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tilled soil had the highest sulfentrazone concentration (171 ng g −1) compared with cover crop treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tilled soile1
Outcome
sulfentrazone concentratione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
171 ng g −1e1
Comparator
cover crop treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e1

“The tillage treatment resulted in low weed biomass at all collection intervals after both application timings, which corresponded to tilled soil having the highest sulfentrazone concentration (171 ng g −1) compared with all cover crop treatments”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 932–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With preplant application 21 days before planting, sulfentrazone herbicide gave greater weed control (93%) than 7 days before planting (60%).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
herbicide treatments applied 21 DPP with sulfentrazonee2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
controle2
Direction
greatere2
Value
93%e2
Qualifier
60%e2
Comparator
when applied 7 DPPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“When applied PP, herbicide treatments applied 21 DPP with sulfentrazone had greater weed (93%) and waterhemp (89%) control than when applied 7 DPP (60% and 69%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With preplant application 21 days before planting, sulfentrazone herbicide gave greater waterhemp control (89%) than 7 days before planting (69%).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
herbicide treatments applied 21 DPP with sulfentrazonee2
Interactor
waterhempe2weed
Outcome
controle2
Direction
greatere2
Value
89%e2
Qualifier
69%e2
Comparator
when applied 7 DPPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“When applied PP, herbicide treatments applied 21 DPP with sulfentrazone had greater weed (93%) and waterhemp (89%) control than when applied 7 DPP (60% and 69%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With postemergence application, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicide gave greater weed control at 7 days before planting (83%) than at 21 days (74%).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
applied POST, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicidee3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
controle3
Direction
greatere3
Value
83%e3
Qualifier
74%e3
Comparator
at 21 DPPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“When applied POST, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicide resulted in greater weed and waterhemp control at 7 DPP (83% and 77%, respectively) than at 21 DPP (74% and 61%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With postemergence application, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicide gave greater waterhemp control at 7 days before planting (77%) than at 21 days (61%).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
applied POST, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicidee3
Interactor
waterhempe3weed
Outcome
controle3
Direction
greatere3
Value
77%e3
Qualifier
61%e3
Comparator
at 21 DPPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“When applied POST, herbicide treatments with a residual herbicide resulted in greater weed and waterhemp control at 7 DPP (83% and 77%, respectively) than at 21 DPP (74% and 61%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1548 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide programs with a residual herbicide had the highest soybean yields (≥3,403 kg ha −1).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
a residual herbicidee4
Outcome
soybean yieldse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
≥3,403 kg ha −1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e4

“Herbicide programs that included a residual herbicide had the highest soybean yields (≥3,403 kg ha −1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1550–1653 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Residual herbicides can be effectively integrated either preplant or postemergence with cover crop termination in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
residual herbicides can be effectively integrated either PP or POST in conjunction with cover crop termination applicationse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e5

“residual herbicides can be effectively integrated either PP or POST in conjunction with cover crop termination applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1816 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Termination timing and biomass accumulation affect the amount of sulfentrazone reaching the soil.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
termination timing and biomass accumulatione6
Outcome
amount of sulfentrazone reaching the soile6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for weed control in a soybean production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–290 · show in text ↑
e6

“termination timing and biomass accumulation will affect the amount of sulfentrazone reaching the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1923 · show in text ↑

sulfentrazone · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 25 positive, 19 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 99 positive, 24 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.