Paper · 2000 · Weed Technology

Weed Control Programs in Drilled Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean1

SCOTT A. PAYNE; LAWRENCE R. OLIVER

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 19-cm-row soybean during 1997 and 1998 to evaluate the rate and timing of glyphosate applications applied alone at 0.42 and 0.63 kg ae/ha and with other herbicides to glyphosate-resistant soybean in terms of weed control, soybean yield, and net return. Weed species included barnyardgrass, hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, and prickly sida. Among glyphosate-alone weed control programs, sequential applications generally provided the highest and most consistent control of all species evaluated (above 90% for broadleaf species). Glyphosate applied in combination with selective postemergence (POST) herbicides or following soil-applied herbicides controlled most species comparable to sequential glyphosate applications. Most herbicide programs, except for single glyphosate applications, were comparable to sequential glyphosate applications in terms of soybean yield and net return and ranged from 2,221 to 2,827 kg/ha and $410.28 to $549.60/ha. Depending on the year, either one or two glyphosate applications were needed for adequate weed control in programs with a soil-applied herbicide. Glyphosate rate affected neither weed control, yield, nor net return. Depending on a producer's management style and weed spectrum, weed control programs with glyphosate alone, in combination with another POST herbicide, or following soil-applied herbicides are all viable options in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean.Nomenclature: Glyphosate; barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #3 ECHCG; hemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Cory. # SEBEX; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Delta King 5961 RR’.Additional index words: Glyphosate economics, Echinochloa crus-galli, Ipomoea lacunosa, Sesbania exaltata, Sida spinosa, Glycine max, ECHCG, IPOLA, SEBEX, SIDSP.Abbreviations: NIS, nonionic surfactant; POST, postemergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential glyphosate gave the highest and most consistent weed control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
sequential applicationse0
Outcome
control of all species evaluatede0
Direction
higheste0
Value
above 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sequential applications generally provided the highest and most consistent control of all species evaluated (above 90% for broadleaf species)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate combinations controlled most weeds comparably to sequential applications.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Glyphosate applied in combination with selective postemergence (POST) herbicides or following soil-applied herbicidese0
Outcome
controlled most speciese0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
sequential glyphosate applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate applied in combination with selective postemergence (POST) herbicides or following soil-applied herbicides controlled most species comparable to sequential glyphosate applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most programs other than single glyphosate matched sequential programs for soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Most herbicide programs, except for single glyphosate applicationse0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
2,221 to 2,827 kg/hae0
Comparator
sequential glyphosate applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most herbicide programs, except for single glyphosate applications, were comparable to sequential glyphosate applications in terms of soybean yield and net return and ranged from 2,221 to 2,827 kg/ha and $410.28 to $549.60/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most programs other than single glyphosate matched sequential programs for net return.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Most herbicide programs, except for single glyphosate applicationse0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
comparablee0
Value
$410.28 to $549.60/hae0
Comparator
sequential glyphosate applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most herbicide programs, except for single glyphosate applications, were comparable to sequential glyphosate applications in terms of soybean yield and net return and ranged from 2,221 to 2,827 kg/ha and $410.28 to $549.60/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One or two glyphosate applications were needed with soil herbicide, depending on year.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
one or two glyphosate applicationse0
Outcome
adequate weed controle0
Value
one or twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on the year, either one or two glyphosate applications were needed for adequate weed control in programs with a soil-applied herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate rate did not affect weed control, yield or net return.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Glyphosate ratee0
Outcome
weed control, yield, nor net returne0
Direction
neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate rate affected neither weed control, yield, nor net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–61 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Several glyphosate programs were considered viable options.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
viable options in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control programs with glyphosate alone, in combination with another POST herbicide, or following soil-applied herbicides are all viable options in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1450 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 42 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

glyphosate · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 70 positive, 6 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 99 positive, 24 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.