Paper · 2014 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

EFFECT OF METHOD APPLICATION OF HUMIC ACID COMBINED WITH MINERAL N FERTILIZER ON SOIL FERTILITY AND FABA BEAN PRODUCTIVITY IN SANDY SOIL.

Dalia A. Sayed; M. S. Mahrous; Seham Y. M. Abo-Steet

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A filed experiment was conducted at winter successive two seasons of 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 in the Farm of Ismalia Agriculture Research Station, (ARC), Ismalia Governorate, Egypt, to study the effect of different methods addition of humic acid on soil fertility and faba bean (Sakha 3) productivity. Theexperiment includes two methods of application (soil application at rates of 5 and 10 kg humic /fed) and foliar application at rates of (1 g and 2g humic /L water) alone or combined with mineral nitrogen fertilizer at rates of (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg N/fed) as ammonium nitrate (33.5 %N). The obtained results indicated that the effect of addition humic acid methods (soil application or foliar application) significantly increased growth character i.e. plant height (cm), No. of branch /plant, No. of pods/plant, weight of pods /plant (g) and weight of seed/plant (g) in both seasons. As well as, the methods used of humic acid (soil application or foliar application) at different rates had a significant effect on of seed yield (ton/fed), pods yield (ton/fed) and weight of 100 seeds (g) and chlorophyll, respectively, while the protein content was no significant in both seasons. Concerning the effect of humic acid application on N, P and K concentration in seeds were increased with increasing rates of humic 10 kg /fed and mineral N fertilizer 30 kg N/fed. The interaction between humic acid methods system application and different rates of mineral N were significantly increase for Fe in both seasons but no significant for Mn and Zn concentration in seeds faba bean plants. Also, the soil application of humic acid with 10 kg/fed and foliar application at a rate of 2g humic acid /L with 30 kg N led to highest available N, P and K content in soil after faba bean harvest compared with other treatments. On the other hand, the interaction between methods of humic acid application and different rates of mineral N fertilizer on Fe was significant in the first season and Mn in both seasons, while Zn was no significant in both seasons. It can be concluded that soil application of humic acid at rate 10 kg humic /fed and foliar application at rate 2g/L water had a favorable effect on yield and yield component and improve chemical constituents of faba bean and sandy soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application by soil or foliar methods significantly increased plant height, branch number and pod number of faba bean in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
addition humic acid methods (soil application or foliar application)e2
Outcome
plant height (cm), No. of branch /plant, No. of pods/plante2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Ismalia Governorate, Egypte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the Farm of Ismalia Agriculture Research Station, (ARC), Ismalia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–179 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effect of addition humic acid methods (soil application or foliar application) significantly increased growth character i.e. plant height (cm), No. of branch /plant, No. of pods/plant, weight of pods /plant (g) and weight of seed/plant (g) in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application by soil or foliar methods significantly increased pod and seed weight per plant of faba bean in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
addition humic acid methods (soil application or foliar application)e2
Outcome
weight of pods /plant (g) and weight of seed/plant (g)e2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Ismalia Governorate, Egypte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the Farm of Ismalia Agriculture Research Station, (ARC), Ismalia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–179 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effect of addition humic acid methods (soil application or foliar application) significantly increased growth character i.e. plant height (cm), No. of branch /plant, No. of pods/plant, weight of pods /plant (g) and weight of seed/plant (g) in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid methods at different rates had a significant effect on seed yield, pod yield and 100-seed weight of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
methods used of humic acide3
Outcome
seed yield (ton/fed), pods yield (ton/fed) and weight of 100 seeds (g)e3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e3

“the methods used of humic acid (soil application or foliar application) at different rates had a significant effect on of seed yield (ton/fed), pods yield (ton/fed) and weight of 100 seeds (g) and chlorophyll, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid methods had a significant effect on chlorophyll of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
methods used of humic acide3
Outcome
chlorophylle3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e3

“the methods used of humic acid (soil application or foliar application) at different rates had a significant effect on of seed yield (ton/fed), pods yield (ton/fed) and weight of 100 seeds (g) and chlorophyll, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid methods had no significant effect on protein content of faba bean in either season.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
methods used of humic acide3
Outcome
protein contente4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e3

“the methods used of humic acid (soil application or foliar application) at different rates had a significant effect on of seed yield (ton/fed), pods yield (ton/fed) and weight of 100 seeds (g) and chlorophyll, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the protein content was no significant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application increased N, P and K concentrations in faba bean seeds at higher humic acid and mineral N rates.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
humic acid applicatione5
Outcome
N, P and K concentration in seedse5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
with increasing rates of humic 10 kg /fed and mineral N fertilizer 30 kg N/fede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e5

“Concerning the effect of humic acid application on N, P and K concentration in seeds were increased with increasing rates of humic 10 kg /fed and mineral N fertilizer 30 kg N/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic acid by mineral N interaction significantly increased seed Fe in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
The interaction between humic acid methods system application and different rates of mineral Ne6
Outcome
Fee6
Direction
significantly increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e6

“The interaction between humic acid methods system application and different rates of mineral N were significantly increase for Fe in both seasons but no significant for Mn and Zn concentration in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic acid by mineral N interaction had no significant effect on seed Mn and Zn concentration in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
The interaction between humic acid methods system application and different rates of mineral Ne6
Outcome
Mn and Zn concentration in seedse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e6

“The interaction between humic acid methods system application and different rates of mineral N were significantly increase for Fe in both seasons but no significant for Mn and Zn concentration in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic acid by mineral N interaction on Fe was significant in the first season of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
the interaction between methods of humic acid application and different rates of mineral N fertilizere7
Outcome
Fee7
Qualifier
in the first seasone7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e7

“the interaction between methods of humic acid application and different rates of mineral N fertilizer on Fe was significant in the first season and Mn in both seasons, while Zn was no significant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic acid by mineral N interaction on Mn was significant in both seasons of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
the interaction between methods of humic acid application and different rates of mineral N fertilizere7
Outcome
Mne7
Qualifier
in both seasonse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e7

“the interaction between methods of humic acid application and different rates of mineral N fertilizer on Fe was significant in the first season and Mn in both seasons, while Zn was no significant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic acid by mineral N interaction on Zn was not significant in either season of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
the interaction between methods of humic acid application and different rates of mineral N fertilizere7
Outcome
Zne7
Qualifier
in both seasonse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e7

“the interaction between methods of humic acid application and different rates of mineral N fertilizer on Fe was significant in the first season and Mn in both seasons, while Zn was no significant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil humic acid at 10 kg per feddan with foliar humic acid at 2 g/L and 30 kg N gave the highest available N, P and K in soil after faba bean harvest.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
soil application of humic acid with 10 kg/fed and foliar application at a rate of 2g humic acid /L with 30 kg Ne2
Outcome
available N, P and K content in soile2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e2

“the soil application of humic acid with 10 kg/fed and foliar application at a rate of 2g humic acid /L with 30 kg N led to highest available N, P and K content in soil after faba bean harvest compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1813 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil humic acid at 10 kg per feddan plus foliar humic acid at 2 g/L water is recommended for faba bean yield and chemical constituents.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
soil application of humic acid at rate 10 kg humic /fed and foliar application at rate 2g/L watere2
Outcome
favorable effect on yield and yield componente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286 · show in text ↑
e2

“It can be concluded that soil application of humic acid at rate 10 kg humic /fed and foliar application at rate 2g/L water had a favorable effect on yield and yield component and improve chemical constituents of faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2047–2268 · show in text ↑

other · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 58 positive, 8 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

other · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.