Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The humic acid by mineral N interaction had no significant effect on seed Mn and Zn concentration in faba bean.

A claim from EFFECT OF METHOD APPLICATION OF HUMIC ACID COMBINED WITH MINERAL N FERTILIZER ON SOIL FERTILITY AND FABA BEAN PRODUCTIVITY IN SANDY SOIL. · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic acid by mineral N interaction had no significant effect on seed Mn and Zn concentration in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
The interaction between humic acid methods system application and different rates of mineral Ne6
Outcome
Mn and Zn concentration in seedse6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean (Sakha 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–286
e6

“The interaction between humic acid methods system application and different rates of mineral N were significantly increase for Fe in both seasons but no significant for Mn and Zn concentration in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1566

Title

EFFECT OF METHOD APPLICATION OF HUMIC ACID COMBINED WITH MINERAL N FERTILIZER ON SOIL FERTILITY AND FABA BEAN PRODUCTIVITY IN SANDY SOIL.

Dalia A. Sayed; M. S. Mahrous; Seham Y. M. Abo-Steet Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2014. doi:10.21608/jssae.2014.49849

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e060f5e17618b06ce5382b7382cd6ffe30511aab4108057ea272ca06e79961c9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

other · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.