Paper · 2013 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

EFFECT OF INTERACTION BETWEEN BIOFERTILIZERS AND SALINE IRRIGATION WATER ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L) IN NORTHERN SINAI - EGYPT

M. A. M. El-Sayed

14
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out during the two successive seasons (2007/2008 and 2008/2009) at the experimental station of El Sheikh Zowayed, Desert Research Center to study the effect of biofertilizer application (Azotobacter chrococcum, Azospirillum lipoferum and mixture of them) under three levels of saline irrigation water (2000, 3000 and 4000 µgl-1) on growth and productivity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L). The obtained results showed that, biofertilizer treatments significantly increased microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere (total bacterial counts, azotobacters and azospirilla densities, CO2 evolution and dehydrogenase activity). Also, biofertilizers enhanced plant height, number of branches per plant, fresh and dry weight /plant. On the other hand, nitrogen content in soil and shoots plant at 35, 70 and 120 days from sowing increased by inoculation with biofertilizers during the two seasons. Number of heads /plant, head diameter, number of seeds /head, weight of 100 seed, stand, protein, phosphorus, oil content and oil yield at harvest significantly increased in biofertilizers treatments. Dual inoculation treatment gave the highest values of growth characters, yield and chemical composition of safflower plant as well as microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere. Increasing salinity in irrigation water from 2000 to 4000 µgl-1 significantly decreased microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere, growth characters, yield, yield components and chemical contents of plant. Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere. Also, application of dual or individual biofertilizer with saline irrigation water improved plant growth and yield and yield components of safflower compared with uninoculated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers increased safflower rhizosphere microbial activities.

Treatment
biofertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
microbial activities in safflower rhizospheree0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofertilizer treatments significantly increased microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere (total bacterial counts, azotobacters and azospirilla densities, CO2 evolution and dehydrogenase activity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers enhanced safflower plant height, branch number, and fresh weight.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches per plant, fresh and dry weight /plante0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofertilizers enhanced plant height, number of branches per plant, fresh and dry weight /plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer inoculation increased nitrogen content in soil and safflower shoots at 35, 70, and 120 days after sowing.

Treatment
inoculation with biofertilizerse0
Outcome
nitrogen content in soil and shoots plante0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
35, 70 and 120 days from sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen content in soil and shoots plant at 35, 70 and 120 days from sowing increased by inoculation with biofertilizers during the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer treatments significantly increased safflower head and seed yield components.

Treatment
biofertilizers treatmentse0
Outcome
Number of heads /plant, head diameter, number of seeds /heade0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of heads /plant, head diameter, number of seeds /head, weight of 100 seed, stand, protein, phosphorus, oil content and oil yield at harvest significantly increased in biofertilizers treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer treatments significantly increased safflower seed weight and stand.

Treatment
biofertilizers treatmentse0
Outcome
weight of 100 seed, stande0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of heads /plant, head diameter, number of seeds /head, weight of 100 seed, stand, protein, phosphorus, oil content and oil yield at harvest significantly increased in biofertilizers treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer treatments significantly increased safflower protein, phosphorus, and oil content.

Treatment
biofertilizers treatmentse0
Outcome
protein, phosphorus, oil contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of heads /plant, head diameter, number of seeds /head, weight of 100 seed, stand, protein, phosphorus, oil content and oil yield at harvest significantly increased in biofertilizers treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer treatments significantly increased safflower oil yield.

Treatment
biofertilizers treatmentse0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“oil yield at harvest significantly increased in biofertilizers treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation produced the highest safflower growth, yield, and chemical composition values.

Treatment
Dual inoculation treatmente0
Outcome
growth characters, yield and chemical compositione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation treatment gave the highest values of growth characters, yield and chemical composition of safflower plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation produced the highest microbial activity in the safflower rhizosphere.

Treatment
Dual inoculation treatmente0
Outcome
microbial activities in safflower rhizospheree0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation treatment gave the highest values of growth characters, yield and chemical composition of safflower plant as well as microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced safflower rhizosphere microbial activities.

Treatment
Increasing salinity in irrigation water from 2000 to 4000 µgl-1e0
Outcome
microbial activities in safflower rhizospheree0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing salinity in irrigation water from 2000 to 4000 µgl-1 significantly decreased microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere, growth characters, yield, yield components and chemical contents of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced safflower growth and yield components.

Treatment
Increasing salinity in irrigation water from 2000 to 4000 µgl-1e0
Outcome
growth characters, yield, yield componentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing salinity in irrigation water from 2000 to 4000 µgl-1 significantly decreased microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere, growth characters, yield, yield components and chemical contents of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced safflower chemical contents.

Treatment
Increasing salinity in irrigation water from 2000 to 4000 µgl-1e0
Outcome
chemical contents of plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing salinity in irrigation water from 2000 to 4000 µgl-1 significantly decreased microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere, growth characters, yield, yield components and chemical contents of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer and salinity interacted significantly in effects on safflower rhizosphere microbial activity.

Treatment
biofertilizer treatments and salinitye0
Outcome
microbial activities in safflower rhizospheree0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on microbial activities in safflower rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual or individual biofertilizer application with saline water improved safflower growth and yield components compared with uninoculated plants.

Treatment
application of dual or individual biofertilizer with saline irrigation watere0
Outcome
plant growth and yield and yield components of safflowere0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of dual or individual biofertilizer with saline irrigation water improved plant growth and yield and yield components of safflower compared with uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1842 · show in text ↑

irrigation · organism · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.