Abstract
Damage caused by water shortages leads to physiological and biochemical changes in metabolism of plants and make them predispose to attack by pests and diseases and reduce the quality of the crops. In order to evaluate the effect of supplemental irrigation on safflower fly (A. helianthi) population of safflower cultivars, an experiment conducted as a split plot based on randomized complete block design with three replications in field conditions. supplemental irrigation included four levels as follows: no irrigation (control) (I1), supplemental irrigation at budding stage (I2), supplemental irrigation at flowering stage (I3) and irrigation at seed filling stage (I4) as main plots and six cultivars including Padideh, Goldasht, Varamin 295, Zarghan 279, Mec.88 and Sina as sub plots. Results showed that with supplemental irrigation number of safflower fly (A.helianthi) decresed and no irrigation (control) treatment had the highest number of safflower flies with an average of 81.97±3.13 pests in the square meter. Amomg studied cultivars, Mec.88 with an average of 93.31±2.88 and Goldasht with an average of 45.89±6.63 had the highest and lowest flies in the square meter, respectively. The results of interactions between supplemental irrigation and cultivar showed that the highest number of safflower fly (A. helianthi) abtained from I2V5 treatment (no irrigation and Mec.88 cultivar). In general, the results showed that yield amount for Sina cultivar and supplemental irrigation at the flowering stage (I3V6) with an average of 2721±12.35 kg/ha was higher than other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental irrigation decreased safflower fly number.
- Taxon
- safflower
Carthamus tinctoriuse0 - Treatment
- supplemental irrigatione0
- Interactor
- A.helianthie0pest
- Outcome
- number of safflower fly (A.helianthi)e0
- Direction
- decresede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with supplemental irrigation number of safflower fly (A.helianthi) decresed”
Claim · model-written summary
No-irrigation plots had the highest fly number, averaging 81.97±3.13 per square meter.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- no irrigation (control)e0
- Interactor
- safflower fliese0pest
- Outcome
- number of safflower fliese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 81.97±3.13 pests in the square metere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no irrigation (control) treatment had the highest number of safflower flies with an average of 81.97±3.13 pests in the square meter.”
t0“SAFFLOWER”
Claim · model-written summary
Mec.88 had the highest fly density, averaging 93.31±2.88 per square meter.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Mec.88e0
- Outcome
- flies in the square metere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 93.31±2.88e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mec.88 with an average of 93.31±2.88 and Goldasht with an average of 45.89±6.63 had the highest and lowest flies in the square meter, respectively.”
t0“SAFFLOWER”
Claim · model-written summary
Goldasht had the lowest fly density, averaging 45.89±6.63 per square meter.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Goldashte0
- Outcome
- flies in the square metere0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 45.89±6.63e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mec.88 with an average of 93.31±2.88 and Goldasht with an average of 45.89±6.63 had the highest and lowest flies in the square meter, respectively.”
t0“SAFFLOWER”
Claim · model-written summary
The reported I2V5 combination yielded the highest fly number.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriuse0
- Material
- Mec.88e0
- Treatment
- I2V5 treatmente0
- Interactor
- A. helianthie0pest
- Outcome
- number of safflower fly (A. helianthi)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest number of safflower fly (A. helianthi) abtained from I2V5 treatment (no irrigation and Mec.88 cultivar).”
Claim · model-written summary
Sina with flowering-stage supplemental irrigation had the highest yield, averaging 2721±12.35 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Material
- Sinae0
- Treatment
- supplemental irrigation at the flowering stage (I3V6)e0
- Outcome
- yield amounte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2721±12.35 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield amount for Sina cultivar and supplemental irrigation at the flowering stage (I3V6) with an average of 2721±12.35 kg/ha was higher than other treatments.”
t0“SAFFLOWER”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · organism · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
stage · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →irrigation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.