Paper · 2019 · Brazilian Journal of Biology

Effect of oviposition by Bactrocera dorsalis on the antioxidant activity of orange juice

M. Ni; K. Gu; B. Hassan; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Among fruits and fruit products, oranges and orange juice are the most widely consumed worldwide. However, the effects of pest infestation of oranges on the quality of orange juice are not yet known. To evaluate the effect of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis on the antioxidant activity of orange juice, we measured changes in the vitamin C (Vc) concentration, total phenol content, and antioxidant activity of orange juice after the introduction of fruit fly eggs. Ten days after the eggs were introduced (larvae removed), the concentration of Vc in orange juice was 18.65 µg/mL, which was 9.16 µg/mL lower than that measured in healthy orange juice. In addition, the total phenol content decreased by 46.519 mg Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE)/g to 9.748 mg GAE/g. Furthermore, the free-radical scavenging activity decreased from 22.297% to 5.393%. Correlation analysis indicated significant correlations between Vc concentration, total phenol content, and antioxidant activity of orange juice after B. dorsalis infestation. The decrease in Vc concentration, total phenol content and free-radical scavenging activity indicated that B. dorsalis changed the quality of orange juice by affecting the antioxidant activity of the juice after the oranges were infested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days after fruit fly eggs were introduced, vitamin C concentration in orange juice was 9.16 µg/mL lower than in healthy juice.

Taxon
orangee4
Treatment
eggs were introducede1
Interactor
Bactrocera dorsalisBactrocera dorsalise5pest
Outcome
concentration of Vce1
Direction
lowere1
Value
9.16 µg/mLe1
Qualifier
Ten days after the eggs were introduced (larvae removed)e1
Comparator
healthy orange juicee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bactrocera dorsalis
Bactrocera dorsalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Ten days after the eggs were introduced (larvae removed), the concentration of Vc in orange juice was 18.65 µg/mL, which was 9.16 µg/mL lower than that measured in healthy orange juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–660 · show in text ↑
e4

“Correlation analysis indicated significant correlations between Vc concentration, total phenol content, and antioxidant activity of orange juice after B. dorsalis infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑
e5

“the effect of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis on the antioxidant activity of orange juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. dorsalis infestation decreased total phenol content of orange juice to 9.748 mg GAE/g.

Taxon
orangee4
Treatment
B. dorsalis infestatione4
Outcome
total phenol contente2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
9.748 mg GAE/ge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“the total phenol content decreased by 46.519 mg Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE)/g to 9.748 mg GAE/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–772 · show in text ↑
e4

“Correlation analysis indicated significant correlations between Vc concentration, total phenol content, and antioxidant activity of orange juice after B. dorsalis infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑
e5

“the effect of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis on the antioxidant activity of orange juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. dorsalis infestation decreased the free-radical scavenging activity of orange juice to 5.393%.

Taxon
orangee4
Treatment
B. dorsalis infestatione4
Outcome
free-radical scavenging activitye3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
5.393%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“the free-radical scavenging activity decreased from 22.297% to 5.393%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–856 · show in text ↑
e4

“Correlation analysis indicated significant correlations between Vc concentration, total phenol content, and antioxidant activity of orange juice after B. dorsalis infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑
e5

“the effect of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis on the antioxidant activity of orange juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–312 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C concentration, total phenol content and antioxidant activity of orange juice were significantly correlated after B. dorsalis infestation.

Taxon
orangee4
Treatment
B. dorsalis infestatione4
Interactor
B. dorsalisBactrocera dorsalise4pest
Outcome
Vc concentration, total phenol content, and antioxidant activitye4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bactrocera dorsalis
Bactrocera dorsalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Correlation analysis indicated significant correlations between Vc concentration, total phenol content, and antioxidant activity of orange juice after B. dorsalis infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1032 · show in text ↑

infection · quality: phytochemicals · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

infection · molecular: metabolites · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.