Paper · 2010 · Journal of Horticulture and Forestry

Substitution of municipal solid waste compost for peat in cucumber transplant production

Yaqvob Mami; Gholamali Peyvast

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) is used in agriculture as a fertilizer, organic soil additive and crop substrate. MSWC was examined as an alternative for peat in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L., cv. Radian) transplant production. An experiment was conducted in 2008 at the University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran with the treatments 100% peat+0% MSWC (control); 95% peat+5% MSWC, 90% peat+10% MSWC, 85% peat+15% MSWC and 80% peat+20% MSWC. Seedlings grown in the only peat and peat+MSWC (5%) mixture had better quality and suitability for transplanting. There were differences due to substrate with a general reduction in values as MSWC rate increased. Use of MSWC is not recommended at levels above 5% in cucumber transplant production. Key words: Growing medium, nutrient, porosity, seedling

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings grown in peat with 5% municipal solid waste compost had better quality and suitability for transplanting than peat alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Radiane0
Treatment
peat+MSWC (5%) mixturee2
Outcome
quality and suitability for transplantinge2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
only peate2
Setting
University of Guilan, Rasht, Irane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L., cv. Radian)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“An experiment was conducted in 2008 at the University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–308 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seedlings grown in the only peat and peat+MSWC (5%) mixture had better quality and suitability for transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–548 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate values were generally reduced as the MSWC rate increased.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
MSWC ratee3
Outcome
valuese3
Direction
reductione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were differences due to substrate with a general reduction in values as MSWC rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–647 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Use of MSWC is not recommended at levels above 5% in cucumber transplant production.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
not recommended at levels above 5%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Use of MSWC is not recommended at levels above 5% in cucumber transplant production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–732 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.