Paper · 2018 · Revista Caatinga

PRODUCTION OF CUCUMBER SEEDLINGS IN ALTERNATIVE SUBSTRATES WITH DIFFERENT COMPOSITIONS OF AGRICULTURAL RESIDUES

LOUISE PINTO GUISOLFI; PAOLA ALFONSA VIEIRA LO MONACO; ISMAIL RAMALHO HADDADE; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Studies on the use of agricultural residues as an alternative to commercial substrates have become fundamental tominimising the risk of environmental contamination resulting from inadequate disposal, as well as reducing seedling production costs. This research involved an evaluation of growth variables and quality of cucumber seedlings produced in substrates with different compositions of agricultural waste with a view to providing substitutes for commercial substrate. The experiment was based on a completely randomised design, with six treatments and ten replicates. There were five treatments with increasing proportions of moinha/decreasing proportions of carbonized rice husk (0/40, 10/30, 20/20, 30/10 and 40/0%) and fixed proportions of coconut fibre (15%), eggshell (5%), pine bark (40%), and one commercial substrate treatment as the control (Bioplant®). The variables evaluated were: electrical conductivity of the substrate, plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves, Dickson quality index (DQI) and dry matter of roots and above ground parts. Results show that alternative substrates can replace commercial substrate without impairing the quality of cucumber seedlings. However, the substrate containing 40% of moinha, 0% of rice husk, 15% of coconut fibre, 5% of eggshell and 40% of pine bark resulted in the highest values for all evaluated variables and appears to be the most promising alternative substrate for the production of cucumber seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative substrates maintained cucumber seedling quality relative to commercial substrate.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
alternative substratese0
Outcome
quality of cucumber seedlingse0
Direction
without impairinge0
Comparator
commercial substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alternative substrates can replace commercial substrate without impairing the quality of cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40% moinha mixture gave the highest values across evaluated seedling variables.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
substrate containing 40% of moinha, 0% of rice husk, 15% of coconut fibre, 5% of eggshell and 40% of pine barke0
Outcome
all evaluated variablese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the substrate containing 40% of moinha, 0% of rice husk, 15% of coconut fibre, 5% of eggshell and 40% of pine bark resulted in the highest values for all evaluated variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER SEEDLINGS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.