Paper · 2016 · Pest Management Science

Larval western bean cutworm feeding damage encourages the development of Gibberella ear rot on field corn

Nicole S Parker; Nolan R Anderson; Douglas S Richmond; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 2 year study was conducted to determine whether western bean cutworm (Striacosta albicosta Smith) (WBC) larval feeding damage increases severity of the fungal disease Gibberella ear rot [Fusarium graminearum (Schwein.) Petch] in field corn (Zea mays L.). The effect of a quinone-outside inhibiting fungicide, pyraclostrobin, on Gibberella ear rot severity and mycotoxin production, both with and without WBC pressure, was also evaluated. The impact of each variable was assessed individually and in combination to determine the effect of each upon ear disease severity. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between the presence of WBC larvae in field corn and Gibberella ear rot severity under inoculated conditions in the 2 years of the experiment. An application of pyraclostrobin did not impact Gibberella ear rot development when applied at corn growth stage R1 (silks first emerging). CONCLUSION: Feeding damage from WBC larvae significantly increases the development of F. graminearum in field corn. We conclude that an effective integrated management strategy for Gibberella ear rot should target the insect pest first, in an effort to limit disease severity and subsequent mycotoxin production by F. graminearum in kernels. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presence of western bean cutworm larvae in field corn was positively correlated with Gibberella ear rot severity under inoculated conditions across two years.

Taxon
field corne0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume1pathogen
Second interactor
WBC larvaee0pest
Outcome
Gibberella ear rot severitye0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a positive correlation between the presence of WBC larvae in field corn and Gibberella ear rot severity under inoculated conditions in the 2 years of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gibberella ear rot [Fusarium graminearum (Schwein.) Petch] in field corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Feeding damage from western bean cutworm larvae significantly increases development of Fusarium graminearum in field corn.

Taxon
field corne0
Treatment
Feeding damage from WBC larvaee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
WBC larvaee0pest
Outcome
development of F. graminearume0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Feeding damage from WBC larvae significantly increases the development of F. graminearum in field corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An application of pyraclostrobin at corn growth stage R1 did not affect Gibberella ear rot development.

Organ / stage
corn growth stage R1e0
Treatment
An application of pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
Gibberella ear rot developmente0
Direction
did not impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An application of pyraclostrobin did not impact Gibberella ear rot development when applied at corn growth stage R1 (silks first emerging)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–907 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An integrated management strategy for Gibberella ear rot should target the insect pest first to limit disease severity and mycotoxin production in field corn.

Taxon
field corne1
Outcome
disease severity and subsequent mycotoxin productione0

Verbatim

e0

“We conclude that an effective integrated management strategy for Gibberella ear rot should target the insect pest first, in an effort to limit disease severity and subsequent mycotoxin production by F. graminearum in kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gibberella ear rot [Fusarium graminearum (Schwein.) Petch] in field corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–253 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

infection · Fusarium graminearum · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.